On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:36:12AM +0100, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:34:36AM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > previously, we allocated one regex_t for each pattern found.
> > This gets pretty nasty once the tree of patterns grows.
> > Reusing one regex_t and regf
On 11 May 2014 12:34, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The attached patch allows to force override mouse selection copy using
> the ShiftKey, similar to xterm. For example in tmux with "mode-mouse
> on".
There was a similar idea proposed sometime ago on the mailing list[0].
And a discussion follo
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Raphaël Proust wrote:
> There was a similar idea proposed sometime ago on the mailing list[0].
Interesting, I have not seen that patch before but it looks almost identical :)
> And a discussion following about who's responsibility it is to provide
> the feature.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:34 AM, FRIGN wrote:
> Hello,
>
> previously, we allocated one regex_t for each pattern found.
> This gets pretty nasty once the tree of patterns grows.
> Reusing one regex_t and regfreeing it after each use inside grep()
> implies just one simultaneous element in memory
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:57:57PM +0200, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:34 AM, FRIGN wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > previously, we allocated one regex_t for each pattern found.
> > This gets pretty nasty once the tree of patterns grows.
> > Reusing one regex_t and regfreeing it af
On 12 May 2014 11:47, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Raphaël Proust wrote:
>> Anyone has further ideas about such a feature and whether it belongs to the
>> terminal?
> In st's-case I think it belongs in st, since it's an X application
> (for X clipboard copy/paste) a
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Raphaël Proust wrote:
> [...]
> It makes sense. Although applications might be binding Shift+Mouse for
> their own purpose (not expecting X to interfere with their input). I
> don't care too much which is chosen because I tend to not use the
> mouse in the terminal
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Hiltjo Posthuma
> The attached updated patch makes ShiftMask configurable and allows to
> use selmasks too (SEL_RECTANGULAR).
>
Whoops, made a mistake, forgot to include config.def.h (forceselmod).
Attached is the fixed-up patch.
From caf4b42ea8d5ac4f8b1f46560a23b43
Hi Xinhao Yuan!
I've been using dmenu with yeganesh[1] for quite some time and I am
trying dlauncher now.
One thing that I found strange was the listing and use of available
plugins. But let's see how I get used to it.
Thanks for the release!
[1]: http://dmwit.com/yeganesh/
On Sat, May 10, 201
Hi there,
I just noticed most of suckless projects use the MIT License, and I just
wondered if there was any place on the suckless wiki that stated why
this was preferred, but found none.
So I thought that maybe this was something largely discussed already and
searched on the mailing list archive
On Mon, 12 May 2014 12:57:57 +0200
Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> (Re)compiling the regex for each line doesn't make sense (imho) and
> slows it down alot.
Damn, how could I miss that? That's definitely true!
Thanks for investigating this, I'll take better care next time.
Cheers
FRIGN
--
FRIGN
Maybe we should include a benchmark script so that we can test if a
patch has a regression on performance?
> Anyone has further ideas about such a feature and whether it belongs
> to the terminal?
I don't understand here why an application should take care of this feature,
and I don't know what is the point here.If someone could explain a bit
more about it could be good.
> [1]: from dvtm(1) manpage:
On Mon, 12 May 2014 10:20:26 -0300
Amadeus Folego wrote:
Hey Amadeus,
I love your music!
> So, given this context, is there any manifesto about this particular License
> choice? E.G is there a reason to avoid GPL?
Well, let's take a look at the GPL first: It's a strict free software
license, w
On 12 May 2014 15:41, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
>> [1]: from dvtm(1) manpage:
>>Copy and Paste
>> By default dvtm captures mouse events to provide the
>> actions listed below. Unfortunately this
>
> Why these actions should be provided by dvtm? X server supplies for
On 12 May 2014 15:41, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
>> [1]: from dvtm(1) manpage:
>>Copy and Paste
>> By default dvtm captures mouse events to provide the
>> actions listed below. Unfortunately this
>
> Why these actions should be provided by dvtm? X server supplies for
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:36:28AM -0300, Amadeus Folego wrote:
> Maybe we should include a benchmark script so that we can test if a
> patch has a regression on performance?
Yes, it has been discussed before. If anyone feels up to the task
to make an sbase-test repo, that would be nice.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:20:26AM -0300, Amadeus Folego wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I just noticed most of suckless projects use the MIT License, and I just
> wondered if there was any place on the suckless wiki that stated why
> this was preferred, but found none.
>
> So I thought that maybe this wa
On Mon 12 May 2014 at 07:41:49 PDT Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
[1]: from dvtm(1) manpage:
Copy and Paste
By default dvtm captures mouse events to provide the
actions listed below. Unfortunately this
Why these actions should be provided by dvtm? X server supplies f
Greetings.
On Mon, 12 May 2014 18:18:37 +0200 FRIGN wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2014 10:20:26 -0300
> Amadeus Folego wrote:
>
> Hey Amadeus,
>
> I love your music!
>
> > So, given this context, is there any manifesto about this particular License
> > choice? E.G is there a reason to avoid GPL?
>
Hi Lohmann,
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 06:18:37PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> History made me thinking about that stance in suckless. Yes, it’s com‐
> plete freedom, but the GPL made it possible to open up platforms not
> open before. For example the US navy is using Open Source softwa
Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> writes:
> For my contributions to suckless I still use MIT/X, but new projects get
> the GPLv3. The harder the better.
Why not AGPL then?
--
Christian Neukirchenhttp://chneukirchen.org
Amadeus Folego writes:
> Hi there,
>
> I just noticed most of suckless projects use the MIT License, and I just
> wondered if there was any place on the suckless wiki that stated why
> this was preferred, but found none.
>
> So I thought that maybe this was something largely discussed already and
Christoph Lohmann writes:
> On Mon, 12 May 2014 18:18:37 +0200 FRIGN wrote:
> > Well, let's take a look at the GPL first: It's a strict free software
> > license, which means that it doesn't permit incorporating or even
> > linking a GPL-software without publishing the software itself under a
> >
Greetings.
On Mon, 12 May 2014 22:01:54 +0200 Christian Neukirchen
wrote:
> Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> writes:
>
> > For my contributions to suckless I still use MIT/X, but new projects get
> > the GPLv3. The harder the better.
>
> Why not AGPL then?
For now none of that projects are a
Greetings.
On Mon, 12 May 2014 22:02:57 +0200 "Anthony J. Bentley"
wrote:
> Christoph Lohmann writes:
> > On Mon, 12 May 2014 18:18:37 +0200 FRIGN wrote:
> > > Well, let's take a look at the GPL first: It's a strict free software
> > > license, which means that it doesn't permit incorporating o
Christoph Lohmann writes:
> Greetings.
>
> On Mon, 12 May 2014 22:02:57 +0200 "Anthony J. Bentley" w
> rote:
> > Christoph Lohmann writes:
> > > On Mon, 12 May 2014 18:18:37 +0200 FRIGN wrote:
> > > > Well, let's take a look at the GPL first: It's a strict free software
> > > > license, which me
Quoth Dimitris Papastamos:
> It is simple to understand. MIT/X does not require a Ph.D in Law.
That's not entirely true, really. MIT/X may be very short itself,
but it is part of a legal system that is inherantly complex, and
claiming that if you can understand the few sentences of the license
Nick writes:
> Quoth Dimitris Papastamos:
> > It is simple to understand. MIT/X does not require a Ph.D in Law.
>
> That's not entirely true, really. MIT/X may be very short itself,
> but it is part of a legal system that is inherantly complex, and
> claiming that if you can understand the few
Just a notice that I've made significant change to it. Now the main
part is completely in C (except the CMake build system), and it
support external plugins through unix socket IPC. So to some degree it
is no longer "monolithic" :)
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Amadeus Folego wrote:
> Hi Xinha
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> Nick writes:
>> Quoth Dimitris Papastamos:
>> > It is simple to understand. MIT/X does not require a Ph.D in Law.
>>
>> That's not entirely true, really. MIT/X may be very short itself,
>> but it is part of a legal system that is inhera
Quoth Anthony J. Bentley:
> Nick writes:
> > GPL is nearly as conceptually simple as permissive licenses, I
> > think.
>
> ...
>
> Clearly, the GPL is just as simple to understand and explain to others
> as a permissive license. After all, copyright law is complex.
I don't think you read what I
Nick writes:
> Quoth Anthony J. Bentley:
> > Nick writes:
> > > GPL is nearly as conceptually simple as permissive licenses, I
> > > think.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Clearly, the GPL is just as simple to understand and explain to others
> > as a permissive license. After all, copyright law is complex.
Greetings.
On Tue, 13 May 2014 06:43:41 +0200 "Anthony J. Bentley"
wrote:
> Nick writes:
> > Quoth Anthony J. Bentley:
> > > Nick writes:
> > > > GPL is nearly as conceptually simple as permissive licenses, I
> > > > think.
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Clearly, the GPL is just as simple to unde
34 matches
Mail list logo
