Greetings.
On Sat, 21 Dec 2013 11:06:02 +0100 koneu wrote:
> Rob wrote:
> > Yeah, based it off url-select, love that feature. urxvt takes 8 seconds
> > or so to open on my laptop, so necessity is the mother of invention and
> > all that.
>
> Configure with --disable-everything and use urxvtd. Fa
There is also Annex K in C11 specifying strcpy_s and friends. Yet it
is optional part of standard, so hard to say if it will be widely
adopted.
--
Paul Onyschuk
Strake wrote:
On 20/12/2013, Rob wrote:
https://github.com/bobrippling/ucc-c-compiler
Why are you rewriting libc?
I think calling it a libc rewrite does it too much justice. When I
started out I needed something I could statically link against that
would be simple to debug, and had compatib
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 01:32:44PM +1100, Daniel Bryan wrote:
> I just read this message by an OpenBSD developer on the prevalence of
> strlcpy in the OpenBSD ports tree:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=138733933417096&w=2
>
> I'd like to know what the opinion here is of these functions. I
Daniel Bryan dixit:
>I'd like to know what the opinion here is of these functions. I've so
Not using them in this time and age is gross negligence.
Using strcpy, strcat and sprintf is even more; using
strncpy is minor negligence, but _strncat_ is positively
dangerous.
So, yes, by all means, use
