On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 01:32:44PM +1100, Daniel Bryan wrote: > I just read this message by an OpenBSD developer on the prevalence of > strlcpy in the OpenBSD ports tree: > > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=138733933417096&w=2 > > I'd like to know what the opinion here is of these functions. I've so > far avoided them, but it seems like there's an argument to be made for > their simplicity, though they're not POSIX standard.
I've included these functions as part of ubase[1]. There is a possibility that they will be included in sbase, if and when we need them. [1] http://git.suckless.org/ubase/tree/util