On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 01:32:44PM +1100, Daniel Bryan wrote:
> I just read this message by an OpenBSD developer on the prevalence of
> strlcpy in the OpenBSD ports tree:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=138733933417096&w=2
> 
> I'd like to know what the opinion here is of these functions. I've so
> far avoided them, but it seems like there's an argument to be made for
> their simplicity, though they're not POSIX standard.

I've included these functions as part of ubase[1].  There is a possibility
that they will be included in sbase, if and when we need them.

[1] http://git.suckless.org/ubase/tree/util

Reply via email to