On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 12:09:10AM -0400, Galos, David wrote:
> > David, what do you think?
> Ideally, sbase should achieve portability through a lack of
> system-dependent code. I think it might soon be important to
> create a ubase for ugly, unportable stuff. ifconfig, mount
> insmod, could live
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:36:01AM +0300, sin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Added sha512sum(1). No support for -c at the moment.
> I've also updated CFLAGS with -Wno-long-long.
>
> Added sha256.h and sha512.h in HDR as well.
>
> At this point we could have a helper function in util/
> to parse the checksums
> David, let me know if this is ok.
I KNEW there was something I forgot to apply! I'll try
to do this tonight.
Hi Robert,
On 28 July 2013 15:47, Robert Schneider wrote:
>> If Robert provides the patch with ifdef __linux__ specificness, I
>> might consider adding it.
Thanks applied. It will be part of the upcoming 1.2 release.
Best regards,
Anselm
Hi Martin,
On 29 July 2013 09:50, Martin Kopta wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 06:59:34PM +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> Do you experience this with vanilla dwm from git? If not, then it
>> might help to see your rules declaration of config.h.
>
> Yes, I use newest vanilla dwm from git without
Thanks applied, this took really a while ;)
Sorry for the inconvenience!
Best regards,
Anselm
On 20 February 2013 11:25, Mark Edgar wrote:
> diff --git a/util.c b/util.c
> index 26953d0..8afa58f 100644
> --- a/util.c
> +++ b/util.c
> @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ strlcpy(char *to, const char *from, int l)
On 11 October 2012 19:11, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 9 October 2012 15:24, Stanislav Seletskiy wrote:
>> Yep, your patch for dmenu looks like solution (and more general, than my).
>>
>> Why this patch is not in upstream yet?
>
> I'm considering to apply it.
Ok, after waiting nearly for a year, I
Hi there,
On 29 July 2013 13:35, Michael Forney wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:47:49 +0200, Silvan Jegen wrote:
>> So the reason you would not want dwm to be a shell plugin for Weston is
>> that Weston is too focused on fancy modern features, correct?
>
> Eh, maybe I am being a bit too hard on
On 1 June 2013 17:12, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Cc’ing the mksh list. Feel free to keep it, redirect there,
> or remove it again.
>
> Christoph Lohmann dixit:
>
>>At least autoconf allows to specify a prefix, LDFLAGS or CFLAGS and some
>
> A prefix is only needed when the Makefile installs; Build.s
On 27 April 2013 21:47, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Anselm R Garbe dixit:
>
>>Can you elaborate on this functionality a bit that mksh provides, but
>>pdksh doesn't?
>
> Not easily; the last release of pdksh was in 1999, and mksh is
> actively developed; even pointing out every single bugfix, for
> PO
10 matches
Mail list logo
