On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 12:09:10AM -0400, Galos, David wrote: > > David, what do you think? > Ideally, sbase should achieve portability through a lack of > system-dependent code. I think it might soon be important to > create a ubase for ugly, unportable stuff. ifconfig, mount > insmod, could live there. Perhaps that would be a better > home for df? Everything else on the TODO looks like it should > be completely portable.
That would probably make more sense. Thanks, sin
