On 14 April 2012 18:33, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> I've written a UTF-8 library based on Plan 9's libutf API, with a
> bunch of improvements [1].
>
> I've tested it on various correct and incorrect inputs and it seems to
> be 100% Unicode compliant (unlike Plan 9), but if anyone finds any
> bugs p
On 15 April 2012 08:15, Nikolay G. Petrov wrote:
> 14.04.2012 19:20, Bjartur Thorlacius написал:
> Try stepping through updatenumlockmask() and checking the value of
> unsigned int numlockmask.
>
> grep -i numlockmask dwm.c
First of all, which dwm version are you referring to?
Second, this grepp
On 13 April 2012 19:12, Martti Kühne wrote:
> after whining earlier on irc, I've got to put things straight here.
> I have two monitors and most of the time I don't really care where the mouse
> pointer is. using dwm with multiple monitors works great, as there is the
> focusmon function, which I
On 6 April 2012 07:41, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote:
> Thank you Anselm for explaining the issue. From my point of view there
> is no other way of implementing a proper systray for dwm as long as it
> contains the bars and has no interface.
>
> Why don't we drop the bars and keybindings and let s
On 10 April 2012 22:11, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> I'm still in favor of separating tiling from tagging, so you could
> e.g. use dwm's grid with 2wm's dual-stack without having to hand-merge
> patches because the dwm patch references context not present in the
> stereo window manager.
>
On 7 April 2012 05:45, Ben Secrest wrote:
> I'm not sure the best way to differentiate between the shadow vs. NIS
> situation. One guess is that when shadow information is present, the
> pw_passwd field of the passwd struct will contain 'x', '*', or
> whatever the system uses as a placeholder in
15.04.2012 13:36, Anselm R Garbe написал:
On 15 April 2012 08:15, Nikolay G. Petrov wrote:
14.04.2012 19:20, Bjartur Thorlacius написал:
Try stepping through updatenumlockmask() and checking the value of
unsigned int numlockmask.
grep -i numlockmask dwm.c
First of all, which dwm version are y
On 15 April 2012 13:10, Nikolay G. Petrov wrote:
> dwm version: 5.8.2
> OS: ubuntu last desktop (11.04)
> Installing:
>
> sudo apt-get build-dep dwm
> sudo apt-get source dwm
>
> (in this step I edit source, under my prefer settings)
>
> dpkg-buildpackage
> dpkg -i ../dwm*.deb
Use dwm-6.0 or hg t
Am 14.04.2012 um 17:38 schrieb Connor Lane Smith :
> But that aside, the distinction between TUIs and GUIs is completely
> artificial. The only difference is that a "TUI" *cannot* display
> images, even when it might be useful.
I think you are wrong. An example for a TUI with images is w3m compi
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Joerg Zinke wrote:
> I think you are wrong. An example for a TUI with images is w3m compiled with
> inline images.
I think, by definition, a TUI cannot display images. It becomes a GUI.
--Andrew Hills
Greetings.
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:33:00 +0200 Joerg Zinke wrote:
>
> Am 14.04.2012 um 17:38 schrieb Connor Lane Smith :
>
> > But that aside, the distinction between TUIs and GUIs is completely
> > artificial. The only difference is that a "TUI" *cannot* display
> > images, even when it might b
On 14/04/2012, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> the distinction between TUIs and GUIs is completely artificial.
This. Furthermore, the distinction between text and graphic is totally
artificial, and the distinction between natural and artificial is
itself totally artificial (^_~)
The former distinctio
12 matches
Mail list logo
