On 02/12/2012 01:12 AM, Rob wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:59:30AM +0100, Martin Kopta wrote:
The process viewer htop isn't drawing properly in st [1].
Is there know solution for st/htop drawing problem?
This is a known "bug", I think the thread on it before is here [1]
Basically, st doesn'
On 02/12/2012 12:59 AM, Martin Kopta wrote:
I know it has been already discussed here, but I could not find any
final solution. The process viewer htop isn't drawing properly in st
[1]. Current load, cpu, mem, swap and other user processes aren't
visible. xterm shows them fine, using dark grey co
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Martin Kopta wrote:
> I hoped for easy solution where I won't have to modify all the hosts I know
> and all the hosts I will ever meet in the future. Thank you however for your
> proposed solution.
The easiest solution is to set TERM to "xterm" in your config.h. O
Greetings comrades.
Some of you might be more experienced in the old Unix ways and
might know how in the good old days all the environment variables
were standardized. What I am up to: There are these new stylish
ways of running applications based on their file extensions or
mime types, which is a
On 02/12/2012 13:09, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
Greetings comrades.
Some of you might be more experienced in the old Unix ways and
might know how in the good old days all the environment variables
were standardized. What I am up to: There are these new stylish
ways of running applications based on
I don't get what you're trying to do.
On 2012-02-11 22:35, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
All the real fun seems to happen in L4
And Minix3. Microkernels will win, eventually...
--
Pierre Chapuis
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:09:44 -, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
Some of you might be more experienced in the old Unix ways and
might know how in the good old days all the environment variables
were standardized. What I am up to: There are these new stylish
ways of running application
Hi Joseph,
On 11 February 2012 19:50, Joseph Iacobucci wrote:
> On 02/11/2012 05:03 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> It does not contain other potential features that were requested
>> during the years, like displaying some text in case the user hits his
>> keyboard. Such features will be subject to
- Original Message -
> From: Bjartur Thorlacius
> Bind mount or symlink. Do not construct pathnames from environment variables.
> mount -o bind /usr/bin/vim /bin/editor
> In fact, the /etc/alternatives mess of Debian would be acceptable, if it were
> not for the symlinks from /usr/bin
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 01:09:44PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Greetings comrades.
>
> Some of you might be more experienced in the old Unix ways and
> might know how in the good old days all the environment variables
> were standardized. What I am up to: There are these new stylish
> ways o
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 09:15:34AM +0100, Martin Kopta wrote:
>
> Thank you for pointing me back to the original messages about
> st/htop. Unfortunately, as I said, I haven't find any solution. The
> message from Stefan Mark does mention that "I agree that in case of
> htop its a bug, because both
I've yet to see a functioning microkernel smaller than the plan 9 kernel.
On Feb 12, 2012 8:34 AM, "Pierre Chapuis" wrote:
> On 2012-02-11 22:35, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
>
> All the real fun seems to happen in L4
>>
>
> And Minix3. Microkernels will win, eventually...
>
> --
> Pierre Chapuis
>
Plan 9 always sucks less than unix.
On Feb 12, 2012 8:38 AM, "Bjartur Thorlacius" wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:09:44 -, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Some of you might be more experienced in the old Unix ways and
>> might know how in the good old days all the environment
On 02/12/2012 12:08 PM, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Martin Kopta wrote:
I hoped for easy solution where I won't have to modify all the hosts I know
and all the hosts I will ever meet in the future. Thank you however for your
proposed solution.
The easiest solution i
On 02/12/2012 04:26 PM, Rob wrote:
All the programs I use work fine in st, except htop, ..
I am glad to hear that.
Although I wrote my own process monitor (http://github.com/jeffwar/utop)
with vi key bindings, since I found it annoying that I kept having to use
the arrow keys in htop
I have
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 05:14:22PM +0100, Martin Kopta wrote:
> On 02/12/2012 04:26 PM, Rob wrote:
> >All the programs I use work fine in st, except htop, ..
>
> I am glad to hear that.
I use urxvt as my main terminal though, but as far as I'm aware, anyway.
> >Although I wrote my own process mon
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:59:30AM +0100, Martin Kopta wrote:
> I know it has been already discussed here, but I could not find any
> final solution. The process viewer htop isn't drawing properly in st
> [1]. Current load, cpu, mem, swap and other user processes aren't
> visible. xterm shows them
On 02/11/2012 01:50 PM, Joseph Iacobucci wrote:
> On 02/11/2012 05:03 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> It does not contain other potential features that were requested
>> during the years, like displaying some text in case the user hits his
>> keyboard. Such features will be subject to future slock rel
Idea taken from
http://code.swtch.com/plan9port/issue/88/build-errors-and-warnings-at-openbsd-50
Fixes also the use of * in rc.
Julien
diff -rup 9base/lib9/dirread.c 9base-fixed/lib9/dirread.c
--- 9base/lib9/dirread.cSun Feb 12 18:00:39 2012
+++ 9base-fixed/lib9/dirread.c Sun Feb 12 19:06
On 12 February 2012 19:17, wrote:
> Idea taken from
> http://code.swtch.com/plan9port/issue/88/build-errors-and-warnings-at-openbsd-50
> Fixes also the use of * in rc.
Thanks, applied.
-Anselm
21 matches
Mail list logo
