Re: [dev][surf] -c command-line option to turn off cookies

2011-11-29 Thread Tomas Hlavaty
Hi all, a slightly better patch attached. Cheers, Tomas >From 08c4b45e2003726a4c3f8d7ef856d5ca5c68aff7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tomas Hlavaty Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:44:28 +0100 Subject: [dev][surf] -c command-line option to disable cookies --- surf.1 |3 +++ surf.c | 15 ++

Re: [dev] Re: dmenu's lsx binary naming conflicts with lrzsz!

2011-11-29 Thread Stephen Paul Weber
Somebody claiming to be Christian Neukirchen wrote: Connor Lane Smith writes: On 28 November 2011 13:35, Christian Neukirchen wrote: Any reason we don't replace lsx with this?  find -L . -maxdepth 1 -type f -perm -111 POSIX compatibility. You're ok with using a util you built, but not a

Re: [dev] Re: dmenu's lsx binary naming conflicts with lrzsz!

2011-11-29 Thread Connor Lane Smith
On 29 November 2011 19:09, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: > You're ok with using a util you built, but not a util someone else built? >  (I'm not defending GNU find, I'm just saying, stest is no more POSIX :) ) dmenu isn't defined by POSIX either; the difference is that stest is in the dmenu repo. I'm

Re: [dev] Re: dmenu's lsx binary naming conflicts with lrzsz!

2011-11-29 Thread Bjartur Thorlacius
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:43:55 -, Christian Neukirchen wrote: Connor Lane Smith writes: On 28 November 2011 13:35, Christian Neukirchen wrote: Any reason we don't replace lsx with this? find -L . -maxdepth 1 -type f -perm -111 POSIX compatibility. All supported except for -maxde

Re: [dev] Re: dmenu's lsx binary naming conflicts with lrzsz!

2011-11-29 Thread Bjartur Thorlacius
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:36:07 -, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote: On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:43:55 -, Christian Neukirchen wrote: Connor Lane Smith writes: On 28 November 2011 13:35, Christian Neukirchen wrote: Any reason we don't replace lsx with this? find -L . -maxdepth 1 -type f