On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:36:07 -0000, Bjartur Thorlacius
<svartma...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:43:55 -0000, Christian Neukirchen
<chneukirc...@gmail.com> wrote:
Connor Lane Smith <c...@lubutu.com> writes:
On 28 November 2011 13:35, Christian Neukirchen
<chneukirc...@gmail.com> wrote:
Any reason we don't replace lsx with this?
find -L . -maxdepth 1 -type f -perm -111
POSIX compatibility.
All supported except for -maxdepth, but you can use:
find -L . -type d \! -name . -prune -o -type f -perm -111 -print
Reading this more closely yet sans documentation, should a '!' -name ..
not be inserted into this monster of argument list, or better yet, the
\! -name . be removed and find allowed to simply rely on -type f? Or
does -type depend on stat??
As suspected, documentation was needed. -o is equivalent to the
nonstandard -or. Relying on -type f would of course not work.
--
-,Bjartur
