"dwm is only a single binary, and its source code is intended to never
exceed 2000 SLOC." (http://dwm.suckless.org/)
$ wc < dwm.c
2069 6745 52319
$
First 25 LOC is license and there is some whitespace too, however dwm.c
is obviously somewhere around 2 kSLOC.
1) I wonder if the rule of 2 kS
Greetings.
Martin Kopta wrote:
> "dwm is only a single binary, and its source code is intended to never exceed
> 2000 SLOC." (http://dwm.suckless.org/)
>
> $ wc < dwm.c
> 2069 6745 52319
> $
>
> First 25 LOC is license and there is some whitespace too, however dwm.c is
> obviously somewhere ar
I am very if my questions are stupid. I am not clever man. And I am not
productive in any way. I have not proposed any change yet. I do not want
to start a flamewar. I have never used sloccount - thank you for the
tip. I will try to learn it and use it. I am not here to disrupt the
suckless wor
On 30/10/2011, Martin Kopta wrote:
> "dwm is only a single binary, and its source code is intended to never
> exceed 2000 SLOC." (http://dwm.suckless.org/)
>
> $ wc < dwm.c
> 2069 6745 52319
$ sloccount dwm.c | grep ^ansic
ansic: 1810 (100.00%)
cls
On 30/10/2011, Martin Kopta wrote:
> 2) Does that mean dwm won't gain any more features?
There aren't really that many features that we could really add to
dwm. The only two I really want are better support for window manager
hints, and improving the distinction between floating and tiled
windows
Some of us are socially retarded, excuse them.
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Martin Kopta wrote:
> 2) Does that mean dwm won't gain any more features?
> 3) Does that mean the code will be cut short to make place for another
> features?
dwm won't gain any big features. Generally, if you want s
Seriously nobody remembers the time where dwm got new features by removing
lines of code? (and this feature was not getting less lines of code)
On 30/10/2011, at 10:00, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
> Some of us are socially retarded, excuse them.
>
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Martin Kopta wro
On 30 October 2011 08:53, Martin Kopta wrote:
> "dwm is only a single binary, and its source code is intended to never
> exceed 2000 SLOC." (http://dwm.suckless.org/)
>
> $ wc < dwm.c
> 2069 6745 52319
> $
>
> First 25 LOC is license and there is some whitespace too, however dwm.c is
> obviously
Greetings.
Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> On 30/10/2011, Martin Kopta wrote:
>> 2) Does that mean dwm won't gain any more features?
>
> There aren't really that many features that we could really add to
> dwm. The only two I really want are better support for window manager
> hints, and improving th
On 30/10/2011, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Apart from this, the boundary of 2kSLOC was chosen kind of randomly. I
> personally feel that an average mind like myself can grasp 2k SLOC
> easily and that this is a good strategy to keep the code readable and
> maintainable.
That reminds me: I think we ne
Greetings.
Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> On 30/10/2011, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> Apart from this, the boundary of 2kSLOC was chosen kind of randomly. I
>> personally feel that an average mind like myself can grasp 2k SLOC
>> easily and that this is a good strategy to keep the code readable and
>> ma
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:50:31AM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> On 30/10/2011, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> > Apart from this, the boundary of 2kSLOC was chosen kind of randomly. I
> > personally feel that an average mind like myself can grasp 2k SLOC
> > easily and that this is a good strategy to
* Martin Kopta [2011-10-29 17:40]:
http://newsbeuter.org/
Not really suckless, but close enough. Also, TUI.
newsbeuter is indeed far from suckless, but at least it's one of the few
RSS/Atom parser implementation that doesn't take parsing lightly. Many RSS
feeds in the real world are seriousl
@Anselm: I think a graveyard is a great idea. Why don't you call it
suck-my-ass-more.org? I can do youtube screencasts for it if you like.
Please don't forget to change the links on wikipedia while you're at it.
Dnia 30 października 2011 14:00 hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> napisał(a):
> @Anselm: I think a graveyard is a great idea. Why don't you call it
> suck-my-ass-more.org? I can do youtube screencasts for it if you like.
> Please don't forget to change the links on wikipedia while you're at it.
Think
Thank you very much for answering my questions.
mkopta
On 10/30/2011 10:33 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
On 30 October 2011 08:53, Martin Kopta wrote:
"dwm is only a single binary, and its source code is intended to never
exceed 2000 SLOC." (http://dwm.suckless.org/)
$ wc< dwm.c
2069 6745 52
* Martin Kopta [2011-10-30 08:53:48 +0100]:
> First 25 LOC is license and there is some whitespace too, however
i'd like to point out that the first 25 lines are not license
but documentation as it should be in any program code
the fact that you skipped the text without reading it just
shows the
Yes, I am sorry, I have indeed skipped that part. However, I have read
it later. I agree that license in source code is not really great idea.
On 10/30/2011 05:58 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
* Martin Kopta [2011-10-30 08:53:48 +0100]:
First 25 LOC is license and there is some whitespace too, how
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 02:00:41PM +0100, hiro wrote:
> @Anselm: I think a graveyard is a great idea. Why don't you call it
> suck-my-ass-more.org? I can do youtube screencasts for it if you like.
I don't really care about the domain name, that was just an arbitrary
placeholder. Thanks for volunte
I've found the following clever ssh-agent stanza in Richard Crowley's
`.profile`[https://raw.github.com/rcrowley/home/master/.profile]:
which ssh-agent >/dev/null && {
: ${SSH_AUTH_SOCK:=$(echo /tmp/ssh-*/agent.* | cut -d" " -f1)}
[ -S "$SSH_AUTH_SOCK" ] && {
export
Reminds me http://www.ioccc.org :-)
On 10/30/2011 08:04 PM, Sime Ramov wrote:
I've found the following clever ssh-agent stanza in Richard Crowley's
`.profile`[https://raw.github.com/rcrowley/home/master/.profile]:
which ssh-agent>/dev/null&& {
: ${SSH_AUTH_SOCK:=$(echo /tmp/ssh-*/agen
On 30 October 2011 00:14, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> * Thomas Dahms [2011-10-29 14:11:59 +0200]:
>> Concerning bstack, I don't find any use for this with wide screens
>> (16:10 or even 16:9) becoming mainstream.
>
> some ppl use rotated screens
> even a 3:4 aspect ratio makes
> vertical splitting bad
> I've found the following clever ssh-agent stanza in Richard Crowley's
> `.profile`[https://raw.github.com/rcrowley/home/master/.profile]:
>
> which ssh-agent >/dev/null && {
> : ${SSH_AUTH_SOCK:=$(echo /tmp/ssh-*/agent.* | cut -d" " -f1)}
> [ -S "$SSH_AUTH_SOCK" ] && {
>
On 30 October 2011 20:13, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> As for the nmaster discussion: I think what I really dislike is the
> fact that adjusting nmaster requires 2 key combos. What I could live
> with is fixing nmaster in config.h.
>
> This leads me to the question to long-time users of nmaster: Do you
> This leads me to the question to long-time users of nmaster: Do you
> guys adjust nmaster frequently, or do you just stick to a particular
> setting? I guess the latter... Please let me know.
I got one 1680x1050 screen and most of the time I work with one window
in the master column. Being able
A bit of an update. I went to find out the *simplest* possible way of
using ssh-agent.
echo 'eval `ssh-agent`' >> .xinitrc
Done. I just manually invoke ssh-add at first leisure. No need for any
fancy shell trickery.
> First I want many projects removed from suckless.org, only the real key
> projects should survive. I plan to set up suckmore-graveyard.org or something
> similar in a couple of weeks to allow for an archive of those non fitters, as
Aside from wmii, what other projects do you have in mind? I'm su
When nmaster was released I was a heavy user of it.. And definitively when I
stopped using it I didnt really miss it.
I find it useful just in few situations, like when coding on 4:3 screen and
needing to read a manpage or src and another src at the same time.
Another use was to get a 2|1 layou
I'm sure someone has thought of this before but it came to me as a
nice way to allow multiple clients in master:
Pretending for a moment that mod+shift+return didn't spawn a terminal
by default, what if we had something like:
- mod+return switches focused window in and out of master, like normal
On Oct 30, 2011, at 5:49 PM, Jeremy Jackins wrote:
I'm sure someone has thought of this before but it came to me as a
nice way to allow multiple clients in master:
Pretending for a moment that mod+shift+return didn't spawn a terminal
by default, what if we had something like:
- mod+return switc
On 2011-10-30 20:04, Sime Ramov wrote:
> I've found the following clever ssh-agent stanza in Richard Crowley's
> `.profile`[https://raw.github.com/rcrowley/home/master/.profile]:
...
> It works partially, i.e. it spawns a new agent on every shell
> invocation.
It should probably test for functiona
> But, how would you be able to decrease the nmaster number?
Focus a window in master and press alt+shift+enter (or whatever
keybinding), so increasing nmaster and moving that window into the
stack. Instead of choosing the nmaster number and letting the windows
arrange themselves appropriately, yo
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Jeremy Jackins wrote:
> Aside from wmii, what other projects do you have in mind? I'm suddenly
> nervous that my favorite software is going to start to disappear...
I think dwm, dmenu, and st are slated for removal, based on prior
discussions on this list.
--Andr
> keybinding), so increasing nmaster and moving that window into the
s/increasing/decreasing/
> ... Anyway it seems like my
> explanation isn't clear so I'll try to implement it and post a patch
Okay, so not knowing the dwm source very well I'm having trouble
implementing this, but I think these
On 31 Oct 2011, Andrew Hills wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Jeremy Jackins
> wrote:
> > Aside from wmii, what other projects do you have in mind? I'm suddenly
> > nervous that my favorite software is going to start to disappear...
>
> I think dwm, dmenu, and st are slated for removal,
On 10/31/11 02:31, Anthony Campbell wrote:
As one who has arrived at dwm only a couple of weeks ago and like it a
lot, I find this discussion alarming, if I understand it correctly. I
came here via xmonad, which I also like; but I was largely defeated by
Haskell. I don't know C either but I have
On 2011-10-31, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 31 Oct 2011, Andrew Hills wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Jeremy Jackins
>> wrote:
>> > Aside from wmii, what other projects do you have in mind? I'm suddenly
>> > nervous that my favorite software is going to start to disappear...
>>
>> I th
37 matches
Mail list logo
