Seriously nobody remembers the time where dwm got new features by removing lines of code? (and this feature was not getting less lines of code)
On 30/10/2011, at 10:00, Aurélien Aptel <aurelien.ap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Some of us are socially retarded, excuse them. > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Martin Kopta <mar...@kopta.eu> wrote: >> 2) Does that mean dwm won't gain any more features? >> 3) Does that mean the code will be cut short to make place for another >> features? > > dwm won't gain any big features. Generally, if you want something in > dwm you hack its source then you make it available as a patch which is > eventually shared on this ML or the wiki. > >> 4) Should be the code made smaller by witty constructions or do you prefer >> boring and obvious constructions (which are generaly longer)? > > I'm guessing witty means clever here. The code has to remain simple > and understandable in order to be hackable but keep in mind that it's > still targeted to experienced hackers. > >> 5) Will be the limit of 2 kSLOC lifted up? > > Maybe it will when support for Xinerama in Xorg will finally end. I > think it used to be 1k not so long ago. >
