Hello,
There is a bug in the last version of dwm (verified on 5.8, 5.8.2 and
r1549) regarding the bar width. By reading the BUGS file, I can see
that it may be similar to the bug reported by "voltaic". In my case,
it appears whenever I change the orientation (rotation of the
monitor). For example:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:53:32 +0200, Nicolai Waniek wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 07:09 PM, pancake wrote:
> > Its anti natural.
>
> It's not.
>
> Because I asked myself which is the best working environment regarding
> ones eyes some time ago, I looked around for some scientific research on
> the topic
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:23:03 +0200, pancake wrote:
> Just to add my 5c to the thread..
>
> I remember in the msdos5.0 age where everybody was using a 80x25 text console
> to run programs and graphical mode was just for games..
>
> Many text editors used a blue background. This is:
> wordperfec
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Bjartur Thorlacius
wrote:
> On 6/11/11, Peter John Hartman wrote:
>> Why not just utilize dwm's tile mode and have each link open in a new
>> window?
> Presumably so you don't have to close a window after every article you
> examine, and resize the search results
Most people here seem more concerned with and interested in radical
minimalism than modularity. Don't get me wrong, I think suckless
software is on many points in the spirit of the unix philosophy. I
just think the principles of composition and as a result modularity
and separation are being neglec
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 09:38:26AM -0400, Andreas Wagner wrote:
> I just think the principles of composition and as a result modularity
> and separation are being neglected.
Can you give some examples of where you see this in
suckless.org's software?
Andreas Wagner writes:
> Most people here seem more concerned with and interested in radical
> minimalism than modularity. Don't get me wrong, I think suckless
> software is on many points in the spirit of the unix philosophy. I
> just think the principles of composition and as a result modularit
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Andreas Wagner
wrote:
> Most people here seem more concerned with and interested in radical
> minimalism than modularity. Don't get me wrong, I think suckless
> software is on many points in the spirit of the unix philosophy. I
> just think the principles of compos
Nick writes:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 09:38:26AM -0400, Andreas Wagner wrote:
>> I just think the principles of composition and as a result modularity
>> and separation are being neglected.
>
> Can you give some examples of where you see this in
> suckless.org's software?
dwm has a built-in sta
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Nick wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 09:38:26AM -0400, Andreas Wagner wrote:
>> I just think the principles of composition and as a result modularity
>> and separation are being neglected.
>
> Can you give some examples of where you see this in
> suckless.org's so
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 00:38:14 +
Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
>On 6/11/11, Peter John Hartman wrote:
>> Why not just utilize dwm's tile mode and have each link open in a new
>> window?
>Presumably so you don't have to close a window after every article you
>examine, and resize the search results
On 6/13/11, Andreas Wagner wrote:
> The biggest example is the huge number of patches for dwm, dmenu, surf
> etc. I agree that these features should not be included in the core
> software, but naturally these patches often do not work anymore and
> cannot be used together. IMHO many of these shoul
Then the easiest to read is amber on black. There is a lot we can learn from
the sharp shooters, and the old dumb terminals.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Pieter Praet wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:23:03 +0200, pancake wrote:
> > Just to add my 5c to the thread..
> >
> > I remember in the
Reading this group for a while I can see that it has a certain practical
mindset that you can find elsewhere on the internet.
For instance, the Surly folks in the bike touring groups who talk about wool
paniers and shorts along with leather saddles as the best technology around.
And, to be honest,
Dnia 13 czerwca 2011 20:14 Michael Farnbach
napisał(a):
> Then the easiest to read is amber on black. There is a lot we can
> learn from the sharp shooters, and the old dumb terminals.
Wondering if this concept is related to "selective yellow" [1]
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_y
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 08:49:45PM +0200, Jakub Lach wrote:
> To add another one, I'm not entirely sure LCD vs CRT
> eyes health debate is settled.
>
I'm fairly sure the "Cathode ray cannon pointed at your head; is it safe ?"
debate is well over..
djp
Since revision 202 cursor is hidden after I quit from mutt. If I do
"update 201", everything is ok. I don't know how to fix it right way.
Also "reset" command don't help, cursor is still hidden. Is it a bug?
http://hg.suckless.org/st/rev/0f21f57006c9
17 matches
Mail list logo