On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:23:03 +0200, pancake <panc...@youterm.com> wrote:
> Just to add my 5c to the thread..
> 
> I remember in the msdos5.0 age where everybody was using a 80x25 text console 
> to run programs and graphical mode was just for games..
> 
> Many text editors used a blue background. This is: 
> wordperfect/wordstar/edit.com ..
> 
> I remember my teacher arguing this as something medically prooft that white 
> or black on blue is better than b/w or w/b.

Your teacher is full of shit.

Google "photoreceptor cell apoptosis induced by in vivo blue light exposure".

Hint: "apoptosis" means DEATH.

> Another point in this topic is that many ebook readers (iBooks) allow to 
> change the background color to 'sepia'. Which is good for long readings, as 
> the contrast is lower than b/w.
> 
> I think that for long readings you use to be in a fixed position and your 
> eyes get more tired if there's more bright on the screen.
> 
> Also crt and lcd/tft screens have differet brightness effects. Tft are less 
> damaging to eyes than crt.. So i think discussion about colors on text moved 
> to only stethical and personal issue because its no longer dramatic as it was 
> in the crt era.
> 
> 
> --pancake
> 
> On 12/06/2011, at 12:20, Connor Lane Smith <c...@lubutu.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 12 June 2011 10:53, Nicolai Waniek <roc...@rochus.net> wrote:
> >> Quite the opposite, that they could not detect any difference.
> > 
> > So uh, not *quite* the opposite.
> > 
> > I'm willing to believe people have a higher reading speed with
> > black-on-white, though I suspect this is in part because that's how we
> > read the vast majority of the time. However, especially when I'm
> > tired, I can *feel* my eyes strain against the brightness (and if you
> > lower the brightness you get an unreadable grey-on-grey). We may be
> > good at reading black-on-white, but perhaps not black-on-fluorescent.
> > 
> > It's possible I'm an outlier, being almost blind in one eye, but I
> > doubt that has much of an effect in this case.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > cls
> > 
> 

Peace

-- 
Pieter

Reply via email to