+ John Matthewman ---+
>
> I also have two wishes:
>
> - Make it possible to turn off highlighting (syntax highlighting,
> highlighting the current line) and colour. I'm sure I'm not the only
> person who doesn't need that stuff..?
> - Keep it as a
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 4:52 AM, John Matthewman wrote:
> Yea, probably a good idea (of course, ignoring Emacs' chained
> keybindings). Sandy would benefit from a better set of default
> bindings. Though for reference you might want to look at something
> like mg [http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/ma
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Aurélien Aptel
wrote:
> arrows on them. A triangle layout (wqsd or ijkl for example) is much
> easier to type.
I meant wasd (on qwerty), obviously.
On Fri, 27 May 2011 10:29:17 +0200
Aurélien Aptel wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 4:52 AM, John Matthewman
> wrote:
> > Yea, probably a good idea (of course, ignoring Emacs' chained
> > keybindings). Sandy would benefit from a better set of default
> > bindings. Though for reference you might w
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> how ironic you pledge for "sane" keybindings and suggest
> bindings optimized for qwerty users...
I've used qwerty bindings for the example so anyone could follow. I
don't use qwerty myself.
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:22 PM, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hmm. How do you "buffer linewise"?
I'm 99% sure that means the songs file is a line-delimited list of filenames.
--Andrew Hills
I still don't get the whole idea.
http://sqweek.dnsdojo.org/code/m9u/
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Rafa Garcia Gallego
wrote:
> That is indeed a great idea. I'll try to stick with the UNIX defaults,
> fill in with Emacs when in doubt and remove META when possible.
Please, please, please do not use Emacs-style "chains". They make no
sense and hurt the hands.
>
> *Please*, use sane keybindings. Emacs and vi were made with a specific
> keyboard from the 70s in mind. A time were the hjkl keys had little
> arrows on them. A triangle layout (wqsd or ijkl for example) is much
> easier to type.
Puke. Triangle layout may be more intuitive to learn for single ch
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Noah Birnel wrote:
> Puke. Triangle layout may be more intuitive to learn for single char/line
> movement, but is probably not easier to type. Certainly not WASD layout,
> laying on the weak fingers of the left hand.
wasd is only an example... Pick another triangl
Sam has sane keybindins.
On May 27, 2011 2:26 PM, "Noah Birnel" wrote:
>> *Please*, use sane keybindings. Emacs and vi were made with a specific
>> keyboard from the 70s in mind. A time were the hjkl keys had little
>> arrows on them. A triangle layout (wqsd or ijkl for example) is much
>> easier
On 27 May 2011 10:46, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Aurélien Aptel
> wrote:
> > arrows on them. A triangle layout (wqsd or ijkl for example) is much
> > easier to type.
>
> I meant wasd (on qwerty), obviously.
>
> that would be just sweet for the myriads of colemak us
I think we can safely agree that both of these suck:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 123K 2011-01-26 20:11 /usr/bin/curl*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 346K 2011-02-20 12:05 /usr/bin/wget*
Since I can't be the first to realize that, is there already a suckless
alternative for simple HTTP/FTP data transfer?
-
I tend to use axel - http://axel.alioth.debian.org/
Regards,
Stanislav Paskalev
Hi,
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:49:50PM +0200, ilf wrote:
> I think we can safely agree that both of these suck:
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 123K 2011-01-26 20:11 /usr/bin/curl*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 346K 2011-02-20 12:05 /usr/bin/wget*
>
> Since I can't be the first to realize that, is there a
> I think we can safely agree that both of these suck:
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 123K 2011-01-26 20:11 /usr/bin/curl*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 346K 2011-02-20 12:05 /usr/bin/wget*
>
> Since I can't be the first to realize that, is there already a suckless
> alternative for simple HTTP/FTP data
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:01:51AM +0200, pancake wrote:
> I found this chess implementation in obfuscated C. I'm sure than
> cleaning it up
> (deobfuscating it) will make it ready to be in the cathegory of
> "suckless games"
>
> http://nanochess.110mb.com/chess1_es.html
>
> What do you think a
sorry for double post, missed the attachment.
v4hn
/* simple chess implementation by v4hn @ 2009 */
#include
#include
#include
typedef enum {
BLACK = 0x00,
WHITE = 0x20
} chess_color;
typedef unsigned short chess_move;
typedef signed char chess_pos;
typedef char* chess_board;
#define I
On 05-28 00:00, u...@netbeisser.de wrote:
why not use standard tools?
14K /usr/bin/GET
70K /usr/bin/ftp
/usr/bin/GET: symbolic link to `lwp-request'
/usr/bin/lwp-request: a /usr/bin/perl -w script text executable
--
ilf
Über 80 Millionen Deutsche benutzen keine Konsole. Klick dich nicht weg
Here's one I wrote: http://github.com/jeffwar/wgetlite
26K without debugging symbols, unfortunately it doesn't statically link yet
(getaddrinfo), but it'll be pretty trivial to sort it.
Hey,
Here's one I just hacked together for fun. It uses netcat. It
understands redirects, but that's it.
-8<-
#!/bin/sh
if test $# -ne 1; then
echo "usage: $0 url" >&2
exit 1
fi
wget (){
url="$(echo "$1" | sed 's/^http:\/\///')"
host="$(echo "$url" | sed 's/\/.*//')"
path="$(ec
On 28 May 2011 00:34, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> Here's one I just hacked together for fun. It uses netcat. It
> understands redirects, but that's it.
Except I made a typo on line 10 -- 's/(/|(/' -- and it doesn't work
for every site, it seems. I'll probably work out why when I have more
time. St
> Since I can't be the first to realize that, is there already a
> suckless alternative for simple HTTP/FTP data transfer?
I find snarf very handy for http/ftp/gopher transfers.
Maybe it sucks less.
http://www.xach.com/snarf/
jgw
> Except [...] it doesn't work for every site, it seems. I'll probably
> work out why when I have more time.
Might be chunked transfer encoding. At least that was the first thing
that came to mind looking at your code.
> Still, I thought it was cute.
Yes, I actually liked it. Chunked transfer en
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:49 PM, ilf wrote:
> Since I can't be the first to realize that, is there already a suckless
> alternative for simple HTTP/FTP data transfer?
NetSurf uses curl, but wants to get rid of it. It might be worth:
a) looking at their plans for a fetch implementation, or
b) if t
If you're a fan of Plan 9, there's hget[1], which handles HTTP and
FTP. It's not in 9base, since it requires a couple of other libraries,
but you can get it in P9P. Alternatively you can grab a copy of
Federico's Abaco[2] web browser, which bundles webfs and lets you
mount the web as a 9P file syst
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:55:53PM +0200, Arian Kuschki wrote:
> On 27 May 2011 10:46, Aur?lien Aptel wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Aur?lien Aptel
> > wrote:
> > > arrows on them. A triangle layout (wqsd or ijkl for example) is much
> > > easier to type.
> >
> > I meant wasd (on
I asked around, found about a couple of very keybind maps using only Control:
http://www.wordstar.org/wordstar/history/wmvswscmds.htm
Then again they do not implement the unix standard ^U ^W ^H, which
sucks a bit. Also, WordMaster may be unfeasible straight up as the
Return key generates ^J and a
28 matches
Mail list logo
