On 4/6/11, Hank D wrote:
> The problem is that mutt sucks, too.
>
True. It can be configured to suck even less, though. But I want a
minimalist alternative that's configured to suck less *at build time*.
> If the default for a text-based MUA is not to just display text,
> something's awry.
>
IMO,
On 4/7/11, Nick wrote:
> Quoth Bjartur Thorlacius:
>> On 4/7/11, Adam Strzelecki wrote:
>> > (2) surf-2-delete-_SURF_GO-once-received.patch
>> >
>> > This xprop (atom) may be used to tell *surf* to go to specific URL. It
>> > is
>> > safer to remove this atom just after it is set in case we send
Bjartur Thorlacius writes:
> On 4/6/11, Hank D wrote:
>> The problem is that mutt sucks, too.
>>
> True. It can be configured to suck even less, though. But I want a
> minimalist alternative that's configured to suck less *at build time*.
>
>> If the default for a text-based MUA is not to just d
Seriously, do these sites provide anything that IRC doesn't? And no,
groups have no use, and thus don't count. IRC is more distributed than
StatusNet twitter-clones, and has way more implementations. Most of
them are terrible backdoors that are best kept locked away, but some
are almost usable.
Rea
>>> _SURF_GO just after it's set?
>>
>> _SURF_GO shouldn't be read, though, it's only used for telling surf
>> to load a new page. Unless I'm misunderstanding your point.
>>
> If it can't be read, then what's the original security breach?
Nick wrote it shouldn't be read, but it can. So right now
Hi everyone,
I am using dwm-5.8.2 with the pertag patch, and just applied the nmaster patch
(I manually added the code from nmaster-sym.c to dwm.c so that it would work
with pertag). The nmaster-sym.c patch states that it is for dwm-5.7.1, which I
don't know if plays a role in the following "gl
On 9 April 2011 21:46, Novar Tum wrote:
> I hope that this makes sense, not sure how else to explain it. Please let
> me know if you need any additional clarification. Does anyone know how this
> issue could be fixed, as the pertag patch does state that it should work
> with nmaster? Besides th
Hi,
pertag[1] does explicitly claim to be compatible with nmaster. Does
anyone know whether this is an error?
[1]: http://dwm.suckless.org/patches/pertag
Thanks,
cls
Hi,
Thank you for your responses.
With regard to flextile, I have looked at the patch and will use it as a last
resort. I have everything set up like I want, with only this relatively minor
issue persisting.
I actually posted this question on the arch linux forum as well. There, a user
re
On 4/5/11, Bryan Bennett wrote:
> C knowledge is rather low (I'm a python programmer...) so it's going
Reading this line I felt an urge to reply with the words "Die in hell"
alone. I'm going to punching uriel in the face now, for infecting me
with mindless trölling. In especial considering you pro
Adam Strzelecki wrote:
> It is safer to remove this atom just after it is set in case we send some URL
> containing passwords or auth tokens
I'm confused as to the state between setting _SURF_GO and removing it.
It smells like a race condition to me, but then again I don't
understand X11 properti
On Sat, 9 Apr 2011, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
Adam Strzelecki wrote:
It is safer to remove this atom just after it is set in case we send
some URL containing passwords or auth tokens
I'm confused as to the state between setting _SURF_GO and removing it.
It smells like a race condition to me, b
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
Hello comrades,
attached is a patch for dwm, which will add real support for the
_NET_WM_WINDOW_TYPE.
What is this patch against? I wanted to try this out, but even the
first hunk of the patch doesn't apply against hg tip. And the parent
liste
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
Hello comrades,
attached is a patch for dwm, which will add real support for the
_NET_WM_WINDOW_TYPE.
What is this patch against? I wanted to try this out, but even the
first hunk of the patch do
14 matches
Mail list logo
