Adam Strzelecki <o...@java.pl> wrote: > It is safer to remove this atom just after it is set in case we send some URL > containing passwords or auth tokens I'm confused as to the state between setting _SURF_GO and removing it. It smells like a race condition to me, but then again I don't understand X11 properties. I'd like a clarification as to how security is kept in the meantime (between setting and removal of _SURF_GO).
- [dev] [surf] [PATCHES] (1) GConf URL schema handlers (... Adam Strzelecki
- Re: [dev] [surf] [PATCHES] (1) GConf URL schema h... Nick
- Re: [dev] [surf] [PATCHES] (1) GConf URL sche... Adam Strzelecki
- Re: [dev] [surf] [PATCHES] (1) GConf URL schema h... Bjartur Thorlacius
- Re: [dev] [surf] [PATCHES] (1) GConf URL sche... Nick
- Re: [dev] [surf] [PATCHES] (1) GConf URL ... Bjartur Thorlacius
- Re: [dev] [surf] [PATCHES] (1) GConf ... Adam Strzelecki
- Re: [dev] [surf] [PATCHES] (1) G... Bjartur Thorlacius
- Re: [dev] [surf] [PATCHES] (... Benjamin R. Haskell
- Re: [dev] [surf] [PATCHE... Adam Strzelecki