Hi,
I've switched to newer dmenu (one with libdc) these days and noticed that
with the deafult font Cyrillic characters are broken.
The attached tiny patch selects a fixed font aware of unicode and works for
me.
cheers,
--
stanio_
diff -r 91fdc4ef4afc font.c
--- a/font.cSat Sep 11 13:35:1
Hey,
On 30 September 2010 10:49, wrote:
> I've switched to newer dmenu (one with libdc) these days and noticed that
> with the deafult font Cyrillic characters are broken.
>
> The attached tiny patch selects a fixed font aware of unicode and works for
> me.
Interesting, the default font "fixed"
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:49:52AM +0200, sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've switched to newer dmenu (one with libdc) these days and noticed that
> with the deafult font Cyrillic characters are broken.
>
> The attached tiny patch selects a fixed font aware of unicode and works for
> me.
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:35 PM, anonymous wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:49:52AM +0200, sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've switched to newer dmenu (one with libdc) these days and noticed that
>> with the deafult font Cyrillic characters are broken.
>>
>> The attached tiny patch
Hey,
* Connor Lane Smith [2010-09-30 11:58]:
> Hey,
>
> On 30 September 2010 10:49, wrote:
> > I've switched to newer dmenu (one with libdc) these days and noticed that
> > with the deafult font Cyrillic characters are broken.
> >
> > The attached tiny patch selects a fixed font aware of unico
> Maybe you should switch to a suckless language that doesn't require
> several megs of font data.
Maybe dwm should be rewritten to use GTK instead of xlib, and also include a
nice, human readable XML config file?
* Anders Andersson [2010-09-30 13:55]:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:35 PM, anonymous wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:49:52AM +0200, sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
> Maybe you should switch to a suckless language that doesn't require
> several megs of font data.
Please suggest a country I sho
readable XML?
You must patent it.
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
>
> > Maybe you should switch to a suckless language that doesn't require
> > several megs of font data.
> Maybe dwm should be rewritten to use GTK instead of xlib, and also include a
> nice, human readable
* Jordi Marine [2010-09-30 15:08]:
> readable XML?
Valid statement.
He didn't say human readable.
as readable as tar.gz is.
> You must patent it.
--
stanio_
Excerpts from stanio's message of Thu Sep 30 15:19:33 +0200 2010:
> * Jordi Marine [2010-09-30 15:08]:
> > readable XML?
>
> Valid statement.
> He didn't say human readable.
XML fetishists (university) claim that one of it's best features is
"readability".
> as readable as tar.gz is.
with the
* Moritz Wilhelmy [2010-09-30 15:58]:
> Excerpts from stanio's message of Thu Sep 30 15:19:33 +0200 2010:
> > * Jordi Marine [2010-09-30 15:08]:
> > > readable XML?
> >
> > Valid statement.
> > He didn't say human readable.
>
> XML fetishists (university) claim that one of it's best features is
Well, human readable XML is what you should patent, but I guess Jordi
forgot that part in rage...
When I think about it you could use blocks of XML to create letters,
like ascii art.
Eventually you would really have human readable XML!
On 9/30/10, sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
> * Jordi Marine
I have elided human, haven't read Asimov for years...
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:19 PM, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Well, human readable XML is what you should patent, but I guess Jordi
> forgot that part in rage...
>
> When I think about it you could use blocks of XML to create letters,
13 matches
Mail list logo
