* Moritz Wilhelmy <c...@wzff.de> [2010-09-30 15:58]: > Excerpts from stanio's message of Thu Sep 30 15:19:33 +0200 2010: > > * Jordi Marine <jordimar...@gmail.com> [2010-09-30 15:08]: > > > readable XML? > > > > Valid statement. > > He didn't say human readable. > > XML fetishists (university) claim that one of it's best features is > "readability".
That was the point. bad smartass joke, I know. Some others claim interoperability of tool A with tool B, because A can export to XML, and B can read XML. I like this. It makes me hope that I can have a conversation with a Chinese guy just because we both can speak and hear. > > as readable as tar.gz is. > with the correct reader, tar.gz is easier to read than XML. False. :o) With the correct reader everything is exactly as readable as everything else with it's correct reader. -- stanio_
