On 2 August 2010 19:04, pancake wrote:
> Dunno about gold. Url? But well... Being c++ i farly prefer to use radare
> apis. Which are saner and C.
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2008/04/gold-google-releases-new-and-improved.html
It's part of binutils nowadays:
http://sourceware.org/cgi-b
This adds C-d (delete next char) and C-g (abort) to dmenu. These keys are also
used in programs like bash or Emacs.
I think this completes the C-something keyboard shortcuts set.
-- Daniel
diff -r 8e019362118b dmenu.c
--- a/dmenu.c Thu Aug 05 15:41:56 2010 +0100
+++ b/dmenu.c Fri Aug 06 11
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:27 PM, TJ Robotham wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:50:13PM +0200, thuban wrote:
>> However, I'm surprised that this is not the default use of dwm. It is
>> supposed to be suckless, and on my own, I think having "opened tags"
>> that are useless (meaning with no window
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:27 AM, thuban wrote:
>>
>> I just changed the colour scheme in drawbar() so that unoccupied tags
>> are invisible (by making the text colour the same as the background).
>> This was enough for me, as I was mostly concerned with the visual
>> noise of all the unoccupied tag
Hey,
On 6 August 2010 06:27, thuban wrote:
> But what do you think to create the tag justs when you move in? I'm
> just thinking to the same comportement of wmii. Especially, I would
> like to be able to rename tags, and create them as I want (and
> automatically remove them when they are no more
Hey,
On 06/08/2010, Daniel Clemente wrote:
> This adds C-d (delete next char) and C-g (abort) to dmenu. These keys are
> also used in programs like bash or Emacs.
I've added C-d but not C-g, since it seems like an emacsism.
Thanks,
cls
Daniel Clemente dixit (2010-08-06, 03:08):
> This adds C-d (delete next char) and C-g (abort) to dmenu. These
> keys are also used in programs like bash or Emacs.
AFAIR C-g just emits BEL by default in bash (as it used in most old
terminals), but yeah, it's probably good to have it, thx.
--
[a]
Hey all,
I've written a tiny archiver, which I've called "wrap" for lack of a
better name. It is 120 lines of C, and yields far smaller archives
than tar while overcoming the various crippling limitations of ar. It
does, however, only store files - subdirectories are implicit.
Interestingly during
On 06/08/2010, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> AFAIR C-g just emits BEL by default in bash (as it used in most old
> terminals), but yeah, it's probably good to have it, thx.
dmenu already has C-c to abort, btw.
cls
thuban wrote:
>
> But what do you think to create the tag justs when you move in? I'm
> just thinking to the same comportement of wmii. Especially, I would
> like to be able to rename tags, and create them as I want (and
> automatically remove them when they are no more used ).
> Sure, it must be
On 5 August 2010 17:43, thuban wrote:
> I was wondering too, if sometimes we can need 5 tags, another time, we
> could only need 1 tag (if you just want to check your e-mails as
> example). So, the other tags aren't useful at this moment.
> My question is, could you create tags only if they are ne
Thanks to everyone for your answers. I think I will try to solve my
"problem", more as an exercise than an real goal. The first thing will
be to be able to add a tag while running dwm, without restarting.
Because, we can define some tag we use the most of the time, but we
can't minimize clients if
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 08:35:32AM -0400, Donald Allen wrote:
> I think you are putting the cart before the horse. How tags are
> represented internally is an implementation detail. The first concern
> should be the actual behavior of dwm, because that is the software's
> primary goal. How it accom
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 05:18:47PM +0200, thuban wrote:
> but we can't minimize clients if we have too much opened... So how can I use
> correctly clients in an overcrowded screen?
Well, the main client will always have the full screen height so in principle it
should always be usable and the monoc
14 matches
Mail list logo
