On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 1:27 AM, thuban <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I just changed the colour scheme in drawbar() so that unoccupied tags >> are invisible (by making the text colour the same as the background). >> This was enough for me, as I was mostly concerned with the visual >> noise of all the unoccupied tags. >> >> The unoccupied tags aren't completely useless to me. I prefer to move >> to an unoccupied tag and then open a new application (as opposed to >> opening the new application and then sending it away), so I need to be >> able to view unoccupied tags. >> > > But what do you think to create the tag justs when you move in? I'm > just thinking to the same comportement of wmii. Especially, I would > like to be able to rename tags,
You can, but only at compile time. Just change the 'tags' vector in config.h, re-build and re-install. and create them as I want (and > automatically remove them when they are no more used ). Again, i3 does exactly this. If you care a lot about this behavior, I suggest you have a look at it. It's quite good, but so is dwm. They each have somewhat different strengths and which you use is a matter of what is important to you. I am continuing to use dwm because I don't much care about seeing only occupied tags and there are some things that I *do* care about that dwm does a bit better. > Sure, it must be really easy to do it with 9p. > It might look like an appearance question, true, but it is also to have > dwm more flexible to use (because it is very configurable when > compiling, but this configuration is static). > >
