I really like tabbed + surf. Ditched uzbl :)
I am missing two options though:
- display tabbed on the bottom of the screen
- display new tabs on the right instead of left
I think these shouldn't be bloat or hard to implement.
While on this, I noticed dmenu uses the flag "-b" for this. Why was i
Hey,
I don't know enough about the tabbed source to comment on most of
this. I would expect it to be a simple patch, though.
On 9 June 2010 08:12, ilf wrote:
> While on this, I noticed dmenu uses the flag "-b" for this. Why was it
> decided to not make it an option in config.h?
A lot of dmenu's
Kris Maglione writes:
> There's a bug in dash 0.5.6's job control where a SIGCHLD interrupts
> the read loop, thereby killing wmiirc whenever a program exits. At any
> rate, I'm taking a different tack, if anyone would like to test it:
[...]
> + ( Event $event "$@" )
Event loop works
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 02:07:26PM +0200, David Engster wrote:
Kris Maglione writes:
There's a bug in dash 0.5.6's job control where a SIGCHLD interrupts
the read loop, thereby killing wmiirc whenever a program exits. At any
rate, I'm taking a different tack, if anyone would like to test it:
[
Kris Maglione writes:
> As it happens, it was fixed and 0.5.6.1 was released within a day of
> me reporting the bug, and Arch picked it up within a day of that. The
> odd thing is that, though the revision I found pinpointed the bug to
> is one commit after the 0.5.5.1 tag, the people who've report
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 02:57:09PM +0200, David Engster wrote:
Kris Maglione writes:
As it happens, it was fixed and 0.5.6.1 was released within a day of
me reporting the bug, and Arch picked it up within a day of that. The
odd thing is that, though the revision I found pinpointed the bug to
is
'uriel' writes:
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:49 PM, David Engster wrote:
>> It seems Ubuntu installs 'mawk' for providing 'awk', which by default
>> buffers its input, so the above won't do anything. Ubuntu users will
>> have to install 'original-awk' and symlink/rename that to awk, or - even
>> wor
I have disabled JavaScript (and plugins) in surf by replacing line
static gboolean loadimage = 1, plugin = 1, script = 1;
with
static gboolean loadimage = TRUE, plugin = FALSE, script = FALSE;
BTW: why don't you use TRUE and FALSE constants here but use them in line
static gboolean sho
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:14 AM, Kris Maglione wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 09:06:55PM -0700, Suraj Kurapati wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:49 AM, David Engster
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> wmiir read /event | awk '/./ { print; fflush() } END { print "" }'
>>
>> What's the purpose of awk here? I
Hi,
For a while I've been frustrated when I close a surf window, it takes
down the process that created it, along with all windows of that
process. For clicking a link in gmail will open a new window, and
closing that window sometimes closes the parent window as well. Today
I had some time to in
Would Mercurial be considered suckless?
I've always wondered why suckless projects use Mercurial instead of the
standard git for version control that is used by most Linux projects.
Isn't Git more simpler than Mercurial?
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 08:56:53PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 6:14 AM, Kris Maglione wrote:
There's a bug in dash 0.5.6's job control where a SIGCHLD interrupts the
read loop,
Why is anyone still writing scripts in bourne-derived shells? Just
switch to rc and never look back,
Matthew Bauer dixit (2010-06-09, 17:49):
> Would Mercurial be considered suckless?
>
> I've always wondered why suckless projects use Mercurial instead of the
> standard git for version control that is used by most Linux projects.
>
> Isn't Git more simpler than Mercurial?
See the thread from 1
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 05:49:48PM -0500, Matthew Bauer wrote:
Would Mercurial be considered suckless?
I've always wondered why suckless projects use Mercurial instead of the
standard git for version control that is used by most Linux projects.
Isn't Git more simpler than Mercurial?
Have you
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 07:05:27PM -0400, Kris Maglione wrote:
> Have some ipecac and ask again.
Ipecac <3
--
Marvin Vek
-
printk("WE HAVE A BUG HERE!!! stk=0x
Okay sorry, I already asked this before but somehow never got the replys
back and forgot about it.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Matthew Bauer wrote:
> Would Mercurial be considered suckless?
>
> I've always wondered why suckless projects use Mercurial instead of the
> standard git for version
> For a while I've been frustrated when I close a surf window, it takes
> down the process that created it, along with all windows of that
> process. For clicking a link in gmail will open a new window, and
> closing that window sometimes closes the parent window as well. Today
> I had some time
I just tried opening a link in a new window, and the segfault still happens.
It would be nice if a new window was opened in a different instance of
surf, but I have the vague impression that in some cases windows for
the same site sometimes need to communicate. For example a site opens
a window f
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 12:50:06PM -0700, Gene Auyeung wrote:
Hi,
For a while I've been frustrated when I close a surf window, it takes
down the process that created it, along with all windows of that
process. For clicking a link in gmail will open a new window, and
closing that window sometime
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Kris Maglione wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 12:50:06PM -0700, Gene Auyeung wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> For a while I've been frustrated when I close a surf window, it takes
>> down the process that created it, along with all windows of that
>> process. For clicking
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:17:28PM -0700, Gene Auyeung wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Kris Maglione wrote:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 12:50:06PM -0700, Gene Auyeung wrote:
Hi,
For a while I've been frustrated when I close a surf window, it takes
down the process that created it, along
On 10 June 2010 00:05, Kris Maglione wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 05:49:48PM -0500, Matthew Bauer wrote:
>>
>> Would Mercurial be considered suckless?
>>
>> I've always wondered why suckless projects use Mercurial instead of the
>> standard git for version control that is used by most Linux pr
22 matches
Mail list logo
