Matthew Bauer dixit (2010-06-09, 17:49): > Would Mercurial be considered suckless? > > I've always wondered why suckless projects use Mercurial instead of the > standard git for version control that is used by most Linux projects. > > Isn't Git more simpler than Mercurial?
See the thread from 13 February – this has been discussed already (Message-ID: <f67dd0d31002131914q7bd9d6d8gadb2e185e534d...@mail.gmail.com>) -- [a]
