Re: [dev] Re: Simple port scanner again (was: GSoC 2010)

2010-03-08 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 8 March 2010 00:05, anonymous wrote: > On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 11:48:38PM +0100, Uriel wrote: >> No, there is a fairly clear consensus about the meaning of 'process', >> there is no such consensus regarding 'threads', so being explicit >> saying 'pthreads', or 'CSP threads' (as in 'libthread'),

Re: [dev] GSoC 2010

2010-03-08 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 4 March 2010 22:15, Uriel wrote: > Here is an idea the Google folks might like: Port sta.li (and p9p?) to > use Android's libc. AFAIK there is no real linux distro that uses the > Android libc, and this would be a project that might be useful for > everyone. Good idea. I add it. Cheers, Ansel

Re: [dev] GSoC 2010

2010-03-08 Thread Jacob Todd
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 08:25:10AM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > Good idea. I add it. > > Cheers, > Anselm > That was fast. Doesn't Android's libc not have utf8 support at the libc level? I thought I read somewhere that it didn't. Is that not needed? -- I am a man who does not exist for others

Re: [dev] GSoC 2010

2010-03-08 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 8 March 2010 14:52, Jacob Todd wrote: > On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 08:25:10AM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote: >> Good idea. I add it. >> >> Cheers, >> Anselm >> > That was fast. Doesn't Android's libc not have utf8 support at the libc level? > I thought I read somewhere that it didn't. Is that not ne

Re: [dev] GSoC 2010

2010-03-08 Thread Gregor Best
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 02:57:50PM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > [...] > Can't see why UTF-8 would require any specific handling at the libc level. > [...] Aren't strlen() and friends part of libc? -- GCS/IT/M d- s+:- a-- C++ UL+++ US UB++ P+++ L+++ E--- W+ N+ o-- K- w--- ?O M-- ?V PS++ PE- Y++

Re: [dev] GSoC 2010

2010-03-08 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 8 March 2010 15:39, Gregor Best wrote: > On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 02:57:50PM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote: >> [...] >> Can't see why UTF-8 would require any specific handling at the libc level. >> [...] > > Aren't strlen() and friends part of libc? Sure, but according to the spec: "The strlen()

Re: [dev] GSoC 2010

2010-03-08 Thread Gregor Best
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 03:44:28PM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > [...] > Sure, but according to the spec: > > "The strlen() function shall compute the number of bytes in the string > to which s points, not including the terminating null byte." > > strlen() should not count multi-char characters

Re: [dev] GSoC 2010

2010-03-08 Thread Connor Lane Smith
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Gregor Best wrote: > I never read the actual docs of that function (a few glances at the > manpage aside), and if it definitely says "count the number of bytes", > fine. But intuitively, I would've thought it gives the length of a > string, as in "how many letters a

Re: [dev] GSoC 2010

2010-03-08 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 8 March 2010 15:57, Gregor Best wrote: > On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 03:44:28PM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote: >> [...] >> Sure, but according to the spec: >> >> "The strlen() function shall compute the number of bytes in the string >> to which s points, not including the terminating null byte." >> >

[dev] [dwm] Setting up XIM/SCIM

2010-03-08 Thread Benito Cachinero
I've gleefuly merged from Gnome + Metacity to a plain X session with dwm on top. No complaints, and it has done everything I need it to, but I'm stumbling on getting a XIM/SCIM toolbar to work for an IME. I need to use CJK characters on a daily basis, so I find myself popping back into Gnome with

Re: [dev] [dwm] Setting up XIM/SCIM

2010-03-08 Thread Alex Matviychuk
Hi Benito, I use UIM for Japanese input in dwm on a daily basis. I have shift+space mapped to toggle between Japanese and English input. It was fairly painless to setup, just had to add this to my .xinitrc: export GTK_IM_MODULE='uim' export QT_IM_MODULE='uim' uim-xim & export xmodifie...@im='uim'

Re: [dev] Re: Simple port scanner again (was: GSoC 2010)

2010-03-08 Thread Uriel
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > On 8 March 2010 00:05, anonymous wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 11:48:38PM +0100, Uriel wrote: >>> No, there is a fairly clear consensus about the meaning of 'process', >>> there is no such consensus regarding 'threads', so being explicit

Re: [dev] GSoC 2010

2010-03-08 Thread Eze
I like this one too :) On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 08:25:10AM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > On 4 March 2010 22:15, Uriel wrote: > > Here is an idea the Google folks might like: Port sta.li (and p9p?) to > > use Android's libc. AFAIK there is no real linux distro that uses the > > Android libc, and th

Re: [dev] [dwm] Setting up XIM/SCIM

2010-03-08 Thread KIMURA Masaru
i use uim too, but on wmii. scim had have C++ ABI issue ago that was resolved by scim-bridge though. and I heard a rumor that scim devs switch to ibus. uim ships w/ sigscheme, it's fun to me. 2010/3/9 Alex Matviychuk : > Hi Benito, > > I use UIM for Japanese input in dwm on a daily basis. I have

[dev] Fullscreen troubles.

2010-03-08 Thread David DEMELIER
Hi, I use dwm for longtime now, it's the only one tiling wm which does everything by almost default. Like manage fixed sixe windows (zsnes, games,..) perfectly and has a full xinerama support whereas ratpoison does not have free layout or the possibility to manage free windows, same for i3, it doe

Re: [dev] Fullscreen troubles.

2010-03-08 Thread Martin Kopta
I have similar problems with dwm too. For example I cannot play game "apricots" nor "openarena" within dwm. I solve this by using second X server (env WM=pekwm startx -- :2), and use this second X server for games and java things. Not a real solution, but I don't need it so often. Martin

Re: [dev] Fullscreen troubles.

2010-03-08 Thread Anselm R Garbe
Hi, On 9 March 2010 07:16, David DEMELIER wrote: > I use dwm for longtime now, it's the only one tiling wm which does > everything by almost default. Like manage fixed sixe windows (zsnes, > games,..) perfectly and has a full xinerama support whereas ratpoison > does not have free layout or the p