On 02/01/2010 08:05 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> What do you exactly mean?
I guess he means that when dragging windows in float mode, some applications
behave like f***. For example, start a ddd session over ssh and move the window
around when the debugger is running. Though I'm using xmonad, the b
Oh and what he might mean with outline moving: just drawing the outline of a
window that is to be moved, looking as if you only move around its border to
the window's future position and not actually moving the window until you have
decided where to place it.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:00:58PM +0100, Uriel wrote:
> There are retarded standards for all kinds of crap, too bad that there
> are thousands of standards and nobody follows them anyway.
>
> It is simple, the system user knows much better where shit is than the
> developer can dream knowing, if t
On 1 February 2010 09:38, Dmitry Maluka wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 11:00:58PM +0100, Uriel wrote:
>> There are retarded standards for all kinds of crap, too bad that there
>> are thousands of standards and nobody follows them anyway.
>>
>> It is simple, the system user knows much better wher
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 07:05:11AM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> [...]
> Thanks for reporting this issue, I will look into it, most likely it's
> sdl brokeness. Will see if there is a workaround.
> [...]
Given that the issue also appears with Awesome, I'd indeed say it's SDL
having a problem with
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 09:48:37AM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> IMHO such a package manager is not needed, all we need are static
> executables of each tool what I try to achieve with static linux. Only
> exception are config files for daemons and tools, however this is all
> achievable using git
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> I agree to all you said, except:
>
> On 31 January 2010 22:00, Uriel wrote:
>> No, it is not OK, the gratuitous fiddling with the .h files is one of
>> the most retarded things about dwm.
>
> If you know a better way, please let me know. The
On 1 February 2010 11:02, Uriel wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> I agree to all you said, except:
>>
>> On 31 January 2010 22:00, Uriel wrote:
>>> No, it is not OK, the gratuitous fiddling with the .h files is one of
>>> the most retarded things about dwm.
>>
>>
On 02/01/2010 12:02 PM, Uriel wrote:
> People are retards that should get a life, and developers that can't
> pick bearable colors should not pick colors (just ask for advice from
> an artists as Rob did for acme and rio).
Desktop Look&Feel Communism up ahead.
Yours is the most retarded and human
[2010-02-01 09:58] Nicolai Waniek
> Oh and what he might mean with outline moving: just drawing the outline of a
> window that is to be moved, looking as if you only move around its border to
> the window's future position and not actually moving the window until you have
> decided where to place
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
People have different taste regarding the colors, fonts, layout algorithms,
shortcuts etc.
People are retards that should get a life, and developers that can't
pick bearable colors should not pick colors (just ask for advice from
an artists as Rob did for acme and r
On 1 February 2010 11:45, pancake wrote:
> Anselm R Garbe wrote:
People have different taste regarding the colors, fonts, layout
algorithms, shortcuts etc.
>>>
>>> People are retards that should get a life, and developers that can't
>>> pick bearable colors should not pick colo
> People are retards that should get a life, and developers that can't
> pick bearable colors should not pick colors (just ask for advice from
> an artists as Rob did for acme and rio). Layout algorithms are more an
> intrinsic part of the application and should not be considered 'an
> option' (and
On 1 February 2010 12:52, wrote:
>> People are retards that should get a life, and developers that can't
>> pick bearable colors should not pick colors (just ask for advice from
>> an artists as Rob did for acme and rio). Layout algorithms are more an
>> intrinsic part of the application and shou
> Having said that, in case of rfork vice versa from FreeBSD.
Yes, I am talking about FreeBSD. With configure you can make your
program portable between FreeBSD and Linux. Most probably other
systems won't implement clone/rfork their own way so program will be
portable between all systems with som
On 1 February 2010 13:06, anonymous wrote:
>> Having said that, in case of rfork vice versa from FreeBSD.
>
> Yes, I am talking about FreeBSD. With configure you can make your
> program portable between FreeBSD and Linux. Most probably other
> systems won't implement clone/rfork their own way so p
anonymous wrote:
Having said that, in case of rfork vice versa from FreeBSD.
Yes, I am talking about FreeBSD. With configure you can make your
program portable between FreeBSD and Linux. Most probably other
systems won't implement clone/rfork their own way so program will be
portable betwe
* Anselm R Garbe [2010-02-01 14:09]:
> On 1 February 2010 12:52, wrote:
> >> People are retards that should get a life,
> >> [...]
> >> shortcuts are part of the UI which should be sane and consistent.
> >
> > This is my PC and I decide what colours are used.
> like nearly no one changes the loo
On 11:15 Mon 01 Feb, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Well if you ask artists they will come up with gradients, translucency
> and other bullshit. I think the default color scheme in dwm is great.
Then you are asking the wrong "artists".
> >> I know you will say there shouldn't be any options, but even we
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 01:06:09PM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> To be fair Uriel isn't completely wrong. In an ideal world everyone
> would just use the software as is and not waste time on fiddling
> around with colors and such. But obviously a lot of people like
> customizing things/making them
This works:
window.alert('test');
Numbered links still don't, I'll try to fix them.
[2010-02-01 13:06] Anselm R Garbe
> On 1 February 2010 12:52, wrote:
> >
> > This is my PC and I decide what colours are used.
>
> To be fair Uriel isn't completely wrong. In an ideal world everyone
> would just use the software as is and not waste time on fiddling
> around with colors and such
On 1 February 2010 13:30, wrote:
> experts rule: Actually they don't want! Ever seen a suckless car, or
> mobile phone?
There was the DDR Trabant, which I consider quite close to a suckless
car: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trabant
As for a mobile phone I'd say that the iphone is quite suckles
A remark about the Trabant, quote from the Wikipedia article
"[...] as even refueling the car required lifting the hood, filling
the tank with gasoline (only 24 litres[1]), then adding two-stroke oil
and shaking it back and forth to mix."
This isn't correct, in the GDR each petrol station had pet
* Anselm R Garbe [2010-02-01 15:48]:
> On 1 February 2010 13:30, wrote:
> > experts rule: Actually they don't want! Ever seen a suckless car, or
> > mobile phone?
>
> There was the DDR Trabant, which I consider quite close to a suckless
> car: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trabant
Well, Trabi
On 1 February 2010 15:49, wrote:
> * Anselm R Garbe [2010-02-01 15:48]:
>> On 1 February 2010 13:30, wrote:
>> > experts rule: Actually they don't want! Ever seen a suckless car, or
>> > mobile phone?
>>
>> There was the DDR Trabant, which I consider quite close to a suckless
>> car: http://e
On Jan 31, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Nathan Neff wrote:
> Does anyone know of a non-tiling window manager that allows you to tag
> windows like wmii does?
>
> Perhaps a plugin for Openbox where I can do wmii-like tag switching, and
> tag a client with multiple tags so that's it's visible on multiple
> de
Anselm R Garbe dixit (2010-02-01, 15:58):
> On 1 February 2010 15:49, wrote:
> > * Anselm R Garbe [2010-02-01 15:48]:
> >> On 1 February 2010 13:30, wrote:
> >> > experts rule: Actually they don't want! Ever seen a suckless car, or
> >> > mobile phone?
> >>
> >> There was the DDR Trabant, wh
Hah, a trabbie sucks less?! That's pure idiocy!
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Nicolai Waniek wrote:
> On 02/01/2010 12:02 PM, Uriel wrote:
>> People are retards that should get a life, and developers that can't
>> pick bearable colors should not pick colors (just ask for advice from
>> an artists as Rob did for acme and rio).
>
> Desktop Loo
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:06 PM, anonymous wrote:
>> Having said that, in case of rfork vice versa from FreeBSD.
>
> Yes, I am talking about FreeBSD. With configure you can make your
> program portable between FreeBSD and Linux. Most probably other
> systems won't implement clone/rfork their own wa
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:20 PM, pancake wrote:
> anonymous wrote:
>>>
>>> Having said that, in case of rfork vice versa from FreeBSD.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I am talking about FreeBSD. With configure you can make your
>> program portable between FreeBSD and Linux. Most probably other
>> systems won't impl
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:26 PM, markus schnalke wrote:
> [2010-02-01 13:06] Anselm R Garbe
>> On 1 February 2010 12:52, wrote:
>> >
>> > This is my PC and I decide what colours are used.
>>
>> To be fair Uriel isn't completely wrong. In an ideal world everyone
>> would just use the software as
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 1 February 2010 13:30, wrote:
>> experts rule: Actually they don't want! Ever seen a suckless car, or
>> mobile phone?
>
> There was the DDR Trabant, which I consider quite close to a suckless
> car: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trabant
On Mon 01 Feb 2010 at 13:30:00 PST Uriel wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:06 PM, anonymous wrote:
Having said that, in case of rfork vice versa from FreeBSD.
Yes, I am talking about FreeBSD. With configure you can make your
program portable between FreeBSD and Linux. Most probably other
system
Uriel dixit (2010-02-01, 22:30):
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:06 PM, anonymous wrote:
> >> Having said that, in case of rfork vice versa from FreeBSD.
> >
> > Yes, I am talking about FreeBSD. With configure you can make your
> > program portable between FreeBSD and Linux. Most probably other
> > sy
> You idiots keep missing the point: if you need to change the colors to
> improve your productivity then either the original colors were totally
> broken and the developer that picked them should get a clue and fix
> them, or your brain is broken, and you should stop using computers if
> you can't
> If you define your personal identity based on the colors of your
> fucking window manager I feel sorry for your pathetic worthless life.
>
> uriel
Please keep these unconstrained insults coming, I laughed heartily at
the quoted.
> Out of curiosity: what were the other reasons and what did you settle on
> instead (if anything)?
Windows (and the iPhone)
M.
On 02/01/2010 10:25 PM, Uriel wrote:
> If you define your personal identity based on the colors of your
> fucking window manager I feel sorry for your pathetic worthless life.
This is not the first time that you confuse cause and result. Additionally, you
seem to not have a fucking clue about peop
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 22:31:38 +0100
Uriel wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:20 PM, pancake wrote:
> > anonymous wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Having said that, in case of rfork vice versa from FreeBSD.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yes, I am talking about FreeBSD. With configure you can make your
> >> program portable bet
Uriel writes:
> If you define your personal identity based on the colors of your fucking
> window manager I feel sorry for your pathetic worthless life.
Have you considered smoking less PCP?
Anselm R Garbe writes:
> "[...] as even refueling the car required lifting the hood, filling the
> tank with gasoline (only 24 litres[1]), then adding two-stroke oil and
> shaking it back and forth to mix."
Never mind that bit of compile-time configuration -- look at this filth!
http://en.wikipe
Chris Palmer dixit (2010-02-01, 15:48):
> Anselm R Garbe writes:
>
> > "[...] as even refueling the car required lifting the hood, filling the
> > tank with gasoline (only 24 litres[1]), then adding two-stroke oil and
> > shaking it back and forth to mix."
>
> Never mind that bit of compile-time
markus schnalke writes:
> Smooth moving of clients affects only floating mode. Floating mode is
> mainly a compatibility feature for broken software, and most dwm users
> will seldom move a client with the mouse in floating mode.
>
> As implementing a ``outline moving'' feature adds complexity t
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 12:09:28AM +0100, Nicolai Waniek wrote:
> On 02/01/2010 10:25 PM, Uriel wrote:
> > If you define your personal identity based on the colors of your
> > fucking window manager I feel sorry for your pathetic worthless life.
>
> This is not the first time that you confuse caus
On 1 February 2010 07:47, Nathan Neff wrote:
> Does anyone know of a non-tiling window manager that allows you to tag
> windows like wmii does?
just get dwm and disable the tiling layout mode.
You could even write a new layout that suites your needs.
- jessta
--
=
http://jes
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Charlie Kester wrote:
> On Mon 01 Feb 2010 at 13:30:00 PST Uriel wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:06 PM, anonymous wrote:
Having said that, in case of rfork vice versa from FreeBSD.
>>>
>>> Yes, I am talking about FreeBSD. With configure you can mak
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Nicolai Waniek wrote:
> On 02/01/2010 10:25 PM, Uriel wrote:
>> If you define your personal identity based on the colors of your
>> fucking window manager I feel sorry for your pathetic worthless life.
>
> This is not the first time that you confuse cause and resul
On 29 January 2010 19:37, jokke wrote:
> Just suckless-porn 8-P~
...who wants porn with less suck?
Seriously? too easy.
--
=
http://jessta.id.au
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:23 AM, pancake wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 22:31:38 +0100
> Uriel wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:20 PM, pancake wrote:
>> > anonymous wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Having said that, in case of rfork vice versa from FreeBSD.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Yes, I am talking about FreeBS
51 matches
Mail list logo
