[dev] [dwm] pertag and bstack for 5.6 release

2009-07-15 Thread Francois Gombault
Hi there, First of all, I got to say thank you to Anselm and the contributors to dwm, which truly is a wonder. I just switched to release 5.6, and ported a couple of patches that I happen to use : bstack and pertag. I don't have a dual head setup to test everything, but in a few hours of usage I

Re: [dev] OT - suckless or not ? :)

2009-07-15 Thread pmarin
Well, I think the "suck less" term is not original from our comunity. The same happens with "the Unix philosophy" of XFCE (http://www.xfce.org/): "Xfce 4.6 embodies the traditional UNIX philosophy of modularity and re-usability..." On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Julien Pecqueur (JPEC)

Re: [dev] OT - suckless or not ? :)

2009-07-15 Thread Uriel
osx-like == sucks big time. uriel On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Julien Pecqueur (JPEC) wrote: > I'm very surprised to heard about suckless philosophy on a definetly not > suckless project mailing list : étoilé, a osx-like free project. > > Message original > Objet : Re: [Eto

Re: [dev] OT - suckless or not ? :)

2009-07-15 Thread Uriel
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 4:45 PM, pmarin wrote: > Well, I think the "suck less" term is not original from our comunity. > The same happens with  "the Unix  philosophy" of XFCE (http://www.xfce.org/): > >     "Xfce 4.6 embodies the traditional UNIX philosophy of modularity > and re-usability..." Xfc

Re: [dev] OT - suckless or not ? :)

2009-07-15 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:45:49 +0200 pmarin wrote: > Well, I think the "suck less" term is not original from our comunity. > The same happens with "the Unix philosophy" of XFCE (http://www.xfce.org/): > > "Xfce 4.6 embodies the traditional UNIX philosophy of modularity > and re-usability...

Re: [dev] OT - suckless or not ? :)

2009-07-15 Thread sqweek
2009/7/15 pmarin : > Well, I think the "suck less" term is not original from our comunity. http://www.mutt.org/ -sqweek

Re: [dev] [dwm] pertag and bstack for 5.6 release

2009-07-15 Thread Moritz Lipp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I have adapted some patches for dwm 5.6 yesterday, amongst that also pertag and bstack, but I did not had the time to test them well. Since you have added your patches, I will just add the others I've edited: gaplessgrid, grid, push and tilem

Re: [dev] [dwm] pertag and bstack for 5.6 release

2009-07-15 Thread David E. Thiel
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 06:48:25PM +0200, Moritz Lipp wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello, > I have adapted some patches for dwm 5.6 yesterday, amongst that also > pertag and bstack, but I did not had the time to test them well. Since you > have added your patches, I

Re: [dev] [dwm] pertag and bstack for 5.6 release

2009-07-15 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 7/15/09, Moritz Lipp wrote: > have added your patches, I will just add the others I've edited: > gaplessgrid, > grid, push and tilemovemouse. gapless grid and push is already available on the suckless wiki. i'd recommend uploading the patches to the wiki once they are well tested the preferre

[dev] dwm-5.6 focusstack broken

2009-07-15 Thread Jacob Todd
Using the dwm-5.6 tarball from dwm.suckless.org, focusstack only works when in monocle or floating. When trying to focus a client in the stack, dwm jumps back to the master. I'm not using any patch's. -- Jake Todd // If it isn't broke, tweak it! pgpmVzsbRRIjq.pgp Description: PGP signature