Jeremy Jay wrote:
>
> As much as I love dwm and suckless projects in general, I could really
> do without all the off-topic conversations by the same 10 people. If
> there will not be split suckless-dev/suckless-discussion lists I will be
> unsubscribing. I hate to miss all the good code and pat
Kai Hendry wrote:
>
> Don't make me think! :-)
>
> I think every mailing list should have something in the footer or
> header to unsubscribe with a single click.
>
> Ok, if the footer is accidentally reproduced in a reply, then the
> poster deserves to be unsubscribed. ;)
>
That is a truely horr
Uriel wrote:
>
> P.S.: Perhaps having chat@ for random crap and relegating dev@ for
> only technical discussions would work, but often it is hard to know
> where to draw the line, and two lists with very low traffic are really
> a waste of time. Really given the insanely low traffic levels in thi
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 5:20 AM, Alexander Clouter wrote:
> I think XKCD were the first people to come up with a solution to this
> problem[1].
Attempting to solve social problems with code? Adorable. How did IRC
ever work before some guy's webcomic fixed its problems
--
# Kurt H Maier
On 6/13/09, Alexander Clouter wrote:
> I think XKCD were the first people to come up with a solution to this
> problem[1].
no he isn't
that is the wrong solution to the wrong problem and has never worked,
just generates more noise
it does not make humans more intelligent or more bearable and
parti
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:15:54 +0100
Alexander Clouter wrote:
> Jeremy Jay wrote:
> >
> > As much as I love dwm and suckless projects in general, I could
> > really do without all the off-topic conversations by the same 10
> > people. If there will not be split
> > suckless-dev/suckless-discussio
Obviously fun should also be outlawed on the internet along with humor
and curiousity.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 03:39:35PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 6/13/09, Alexander Clouter wrote:
> > I think XKCD were the first people to come up with a solution to this
> > problem[1].
> no he isn't
> th
You make a good point! Then I suppose that means you could filter
out...this thread?
Thomas
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 03:55:13PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:15:54 +0100
> Alexander Clouter wrote:
>
> > Jeremy Jay wrote:
> > >
> > > As much as I love dwm and suckless pro
I use dwm-5.3.1 some time now and i really love the "gapless grid" layout
and the "save floats" patch.
I recently tried to upgrade to dwm-5.5, but it seems that the "save floats"
patch is no longer compatible...
The official page states that "it has recently become part of the main dwm
distribution
On 6/13/09, Thanos Zygouris wrote:
> I use dwm-5.3.1 some time now and i really love the "gapless grid" layout
> and the "save floats" patch.
> I recently tried to upgrade to dwm-5.5, but it seems that the "save floats"
> patch is no longer compatible...
> The official page states that "it has rec
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 6/13/09, Thanos Zygouris wrote:
>> I use dwm-5.3.1 some time now and i really love the "gapless grid" layout
>> and the "save floats" patch.
>> I recently tried to upgrade to dwm-5.5, but it seems that the "save floats"
>> patch is no lon
11 matches
Mail list logo
