On Oct 7, 2016 7:24 AM, "Bruno Vetter" wrote:
> yes, it's tedious and I understand that it's not crucial to have the
> toolchain statically linked. Trying to do so also brings up a lot of
> questions that I cannot answer easily. For example a statically linked linker
> apparently does not suppo
Hi Anselm,
yes, it's tedious and I understand that it's not crucial to have the toolchain
statically linked. Trying to do so also brings up a lot of questions that I
cannot answer easily. For example a statically linked linker apparently does
not support an lto plugin. I have no idea if that wo
Hi Cág,
it's important for me to understand that stali applications are meant to be
compiled on a separate host. Thanks for clarifying that. I had just started
building a native static toolchain for stali based on Linux from Scratch which
taught me quite a lot about the crappy things like auto-
Thanks Cag,
building several applications like this on a host works fine. But how do I get
a statically-linked native toolchain for my target system? The cloned toolchain
from git is all dynamic.
Cheers
Bruno
Von: Cág
Gesendet: Montag, 3. Oktober 2016 21:28
An: dev mail list
Betreff:
