Hi Anselm,
yes, it's tedious and I understand that it's not crucial to have the toolchain
statically linked. Trying to do so also brings up a lot of questions that I
cannot answer easily. For example a statically linked linker apparently does
not support an lto plugin. I have no idea if that would be acceptable for a
toolchain.
I might just go on with the existing toolchain as you describe. Thanks much for
your help.
Bruno
Von: Anselm R Garbe <garb...@gmail.com>
Gesendet: Freitag, 7. Oktober 2016 13:02
An: dev mail list
Betreff: Re: [dev] [stali] Need musl based toolchain on stali installation
On 7 October 2016 at 12:27, Cág <c...@riseup.net> wrote:
> Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>
>> It is pretty easy. Use the toolchain as is and copy some glibc based
>> .so's for x86_64 to /crap/lib on the stali target as well.
>
> But it will not be statically linked then, as OP asked for.
Building a statically linked toolchain is a very tedious task. The
important aspect is that the target system is statically linked, I
wouldn't bother too much about the toolchain itself. I tried it myself
for a couple of months, but finally gave up. But my requirements were
harder, I wanted to get the toolchain built statically with custom
stali.mk's.
Best regards,
Anselm
