Re: [dev] HG and python

2010-03-16 Thread Jakub Lach
Dnia 16 marca 2010 19:09 Dmitry Maluka napisaƂ(a): >Don't know what is BSD-like > there. License is (MIT), though I couldn't say it contributes to suck-factor. Rather opposite. best regards, -Jakub Lach

Re: [dev] HG and python

2010-03-16 Thread Dmitry Maluka
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 02:41:30AM +0100, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote: > > >Lua is suckless, seriously. Just look at it. > > I know lua's code is suckless (unfortunately BSD-LIKE). But coding using lua > is not. From there, lua won't reach heaven. I haven't dug much into Lua source code, it seems to

Re: [dev] HG and python

2010-03-14 Thread Sylvain BERTRAND
>Lua is suckless, seriously. Just look at it. I know lua's code is suckless (unfortunately BSD-LIKE). But coding using lua is not. From there, lua won't reach heaven. -- use GNU/Linux, code in C only, protect your code with GNU (A)(L)GPL and keep your rights

Re: [dev] HG and python

2010-03-12 Thread Uriel
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Will Light wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Uriel wrote: >> Actually it is sad that git moved from 'small specialized tools' >> towards a more centralized/monolithic model. But nobody will miss the >> dependency on perl... > > Git is still an array of sma

Re: [dev] HG and python

2010-03-11 Thread Dmitry Maluka
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 08:15:04PM +0100, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote: > > In heaven there is no GNU. > > Neither perl/python/ruby/lua/squirel/scheme/C++/java/C#. > :) Lua is suckless, seriously. Just look at it.

Re: [dev] HG and python

2010-03-10 Thread Jacob Todd
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 05:26:52PM -0800, Will Light wrote: > Git is still an array of small specialized tools, they just don't all > get dumped in /usr/bin the way they used to. On my system they get > put in /usr/lib/git-core. > > -w > Makes perfect sense. -- I am a man who does not exist fo

Re: [dev] HG and python

2010-03-10 Thread Will Light
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Uriel wrote: > Actually it is sad that git moved from 'small specialized tools' > towards a more centralized/monolithic model. But nobody will miss the > dependency on perl... Git is still an array of small specialized tools, they just don't all get dumped in /usr

Re: [dev] HG and python

2010-03-10 Thread Uriel
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Stephane Sezer wrote: > On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:37:54 +0100 > Alexander Surma wrote: > >> And for the bloat: Git is sometimes percieved as somewhat more bloated >> (>100 little tools instead of 1 like hg) - that depends on the point >> of view. > > Is this still tr

Re: [dev] HG and python

2010-03-10 Thread Stephane Sezer
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:37:54 +0100 Alexander Surma wrote: > And for the bloat: Git is sometimes percieved as somewhat more bloated > (>100 little tools instead of 1 like hg) - that depends on the point > of view. Is this still true ? -- Stephane Sezer

Re: [dev] HG and python

2010-03-10 Thread Sylvain BERTRAND
>>> There's always git, the core of which is written in C, but some >>> scripts are perl. >> >> perl support is disabled in my git build. But perl removal is >> somewhat trickier than python because of the GNU autotools. The >> real todo list for perl is >> GNU autotools removal or/and basic GNU ma

Re: [dev] HG and python

2010-03-10 Thread hiro
On 3/10/10, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote: >> There's always git, the core of which is written in C, but some >> scripts are perl. > > perl support is disabled in my git build. But perl removal is somewhat > trickier than python because of the GNU autotools. The real todo list for > perl is > GNU autotoo

Re: [dev] HG and python

2010-03-10 Thread Sylvain BERTRAND
> There's always git, the core of which is written in C, but some > scripts are perl. perl support is disabled in my git build. But perl removal is somewhat trickier than python because of the GNU autotools. The real todo list for perl is GNU autotools removal or/and basic GNU makefile. I tried t

Re: [dev] HG and python

2010-03-10 Thread Anselm R Garbe
On 10 March 2010 11:31, Sylvain Bertrand wrote: > In war against bloat, python removal is on the todo list. > Is there any chance to use something different than hg for source > versioning and branching? I think the most significant parts of mercurial are written in C, and all other parts in pyth

Re: [dev] HG and python

2010-03-10 Thread Alexander Surma
There's always git, the core of which is written in C, but some scripts are perl. And for the bloat: Git is sometimes percieved as somewhat more bloated (>100 little tools instead of 1 like hg) - that depends on the point of view. Surma On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Sylvain Bertrand wrote: >

[dev] HG and python

2010-03-10 Thread Sylvain Bertrand
In war against bloat, python removal is on the todo list. Is there any chance to use something different than hg for source versioning and branching? -- code in C, protect your code with GNU (A)(L)GPL, keep your rights, use GNU/Linux