On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Stephane Sezer <thrashb...@free.fr> wrote: > On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:37:54 +0100 > Alexander Surma <alexander.su...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> And for the bloat: Git is sometimes percieved as somewhat more bloated >> (>100 little tools instead of 1 like hg) - that depends on the point >> of view. > > Is this still true ?
Actually it is sad that git moved from 'small specialized tools' towards a more centralized/monolithic model. But nobody will miss the dependency on perl... uriel
