Re: [dev] Fwd: st patches for more attrs

2014-06-24 Thread Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
My dislexia is getting worse, and if we join it with my poorenglish the result is the next paragraph: > I have a similar feeling, since the blinking time is different for > every processor, and in some cases the slow blink of ons terminal is similar > to the fast blink of another terminal, so I am

Re: [dev] Fwd: st patches for more attrs

2014-06-24 Thread Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
> Yeah. ^[[6m=>Fast blink isn't even on the (now) canonical reference > http://invisible-island.net/xterm/ctlseqs/ctlseqs.html We use http://www.vt100.net/ as canonical reference. > I'm not really that enamored with the fastblink patch either, but I felt the > main loop needed to suck less. Not s

Re: [dev] Fwd: st patches for more attrs

2014-06-24 Thread Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
> impressive patch. I see that it probably has taken some time to write. I totally agree. These patch serie seems very good. > > The fast-blink support involves a bit of mucking about in the main > > loop, and is a bit more debatable. I'm not entirely happy with it, but > > it does separate thin

Re: [dev] Fwd: st patches for more attrs

2014-06-24 Thread Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 03:16:40PM +0200, Anders Eurenius wrote: > Oh, I guess the mailing list manager swallowed the subscribe message > --- > > Hello > > The render- patches are independent of each other, but depend on the > first reorder-and-extend. Please, if you send several patches then se

Re: [dev] Fwd: st patches for more attrs

2014-06-23 Thread FRIGN
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:02:01 +0200 Anders Eurenius wrote: > Also, don't confuse low LOC count with simplicity. Splitting the main loop > has merit even without either fastblink or blink. I'll take a closer look at what you did with the main loop and let you know what I think. In most cases, howe

Re: [dev] Fwd: st patches for more attrs

2014-06-23 Thread Anders Eurenius
> Hey Anders, > > impressive patch. I see that it probably has taken some time to write. Well, it was a lazy sunday afternoon, nothing serious. >> The fast-blink support involves a bit of mucking about in the main >> loop, and is a bit more debatable. I'm not entirely happy with it, but >> it doe

Re: [dev] Fwd: st patches for more attrs

2014-06-23 Thread FRIGN
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 15:16:40 +0200 Anders Eurenius wrote: Hey Anders, impressive patch. I see that it probably has taken some time to write. > The fast-blink support involves a bit of mucking about in the main > loop, and is a bit more debatable. I'm not entirely happy with it, but > it does se

[dev] Fwd: st patches for more attrs

2014-06-23 Thread Anders Eurenius
Oh, I guess the mailing list manager swallowed the subscribe message --- Hello The render- patches are independent of each other, but depend on the first reorder-and-extend. Move default-rows-cols to config is completely independent, and makes sense on its own. The fast-blink support involves a