On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:02:01 +0200 Anders Eurenius <a...@spotify.com> wrote:
> Also, don't confuse low LOC count with simplicity. Splitting the main loop > has merit even without either fastblink or blink. I'll take a closer look at what you did with the main loop and let you know what I think. In most cases, however, simplicity comes with shortness. > INVISIBLE has real and useful use in kpcli, where passwords are written > out invisible, which means you can copy+paste without either > (a) mucking with x selection. (nice over ssh) or > (b) showing your password to shoulder surfers > > STRUCK or CROSSED-OUT (as Dickey notes it's called in ISO-6429) > is right because you might want it to actually mark deletions. > > It's also a legit, non-insane code from a standard, so if it doesn't add > too much, it should be included. Thanks for clearing this up! Cheers FRIGN -- FRIGN <d...@frign.de>
