Greetings.
Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> Þann sun 5.feb 2012 09:02, skrifaði Christoph Lohmann:
Why are we still emulating a 32 years old terminal?
>> Because it works.
> s/works/breaks if you so much as use a variable width font
That's why we have the 22 year old web.
Sincerel
Þann sun 5.feb 2012 09:02, skrifaði Christoph Lohmann:
>
> Why are we still emulating a 32 years old terminal?
>
Because it works.
s/works/breaks if you so much as use a variable width font
Hello.
pmarin wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Kurt H Maier
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 01:18:10AM +0100, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
>>> Actually, st does not implement every VT100/VT102/xterm escape sequence.
>>>
>>
>> Apparently Bjartur does not understand the mission of a terminal
>
Why are we still emulating a 32 years old terminal?
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 01:18:10AM +0100, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
>> Actually, st does not implement every VT100/VT102/xterm escape sequence.
>>
>
> Apparently Bjartur does not understand the m
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 01:18:10AM +0100, Aurélien Aptel wrote:
> Actually, st does not implement every VT100/VT102/xterm escape sequence.
>
Apparently Bjartur does not understand the mission of a terminal
emulator.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Bjartur Thorlacius
wrote:
> Žann lau 4.feb 2012 23:05, skrifaši Kurt H Maier:
>>
>> There are already terminals that care about such
>> bullshit; why write another?
Actually, st does not implement every VT100/VT102/xterm escape sequence.
Þann lau 4.feb 2012 23:05, skrifaði Kurt H Maier:
There are already terminals that care about such
bullshit; why write another?
