Why are we still emulating a 32 years old terminal? On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Kurt H Maier <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 01:18:10AM +0100, Aurélien Aptel wrote: >> Actually, st does not implement every VT100/VT102/xterm escape sequence. >> > > Apparently Bjartur does not understand the mission of a terminal > emulator. >
- [dev] [st] Handling of WM_DELETE_WINDOW atom Ivan Kanakarakis
- Re: [dev] [st] Handling of WM_DELETE_WINDOW atom Kurt H Maier
- Re: [dev] [st] Handling of WM_DELETE_WINDOW at... Bjartur Thorlacius
- Re: [dev] [st] Handling of WM_DELETE_WINDO... Kurt H Maier
- Re: [dev] [st] VT100 Emulation Bjartur Thorlacius
- Re: [dev] [st] VT100 Emulation Aurélien Aptel
- Re: [dev] [st] VT100 Emulatio... Kurt H Maier
- Re: [dev] [st] VT100 Emul... pmarin
- Re: [dev] [st] VT100 Emul... Christoph Lohmann
- Re: [dev] [st] VT100 Emul... Bjartur Thorlacius
- Re: [dev] [st] VT100 Emul... Christoph Lohmann
