Am 11.12.2012 um 18:34 schrieb Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net>:
> I don’t know why people prefer to see the big patches inline,
Ideally the patches are small :)
> so you
> have the scroll past the whole patch to the next e‐mail, when you are
So, scrolling is a problem for you? I do +
Am 11.12.2012 um 12:38 schrieb Marc Andre Tanner :
Please send patches as attached files.
>>>
>>> Since we are using now git, it is easier and logic send the patches in this
>>> way, so the code of the patch can be included and modified in replies. You
>>> only have to use git am if you wan
On 11 December 2012 18:33, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 06:25:04PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:25:04 +0100 Marc Andre Tanner
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:39:55AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
>> > > > > Please send patches as att
Greetings.
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:34:19 +0100 Antonio Quartulli
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 06:25:04PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > Greetings.
> >
> > On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:25:04 +0100 Marc Andre Tanner
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:39:55AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 06:25:04PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:25:04 +0100 Marc Andre Tanner
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:39:55AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > > > > Please send patches as attached files.
> > > >
> > > > Since we are
Greetings.
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:25:04 +0100 Marc Andre Tanner
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:39:55AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > > > Please send patches as attached files.
> > >
> > > Since we are using now git, it is easier and logic send the patches in
> > > this
> > > way, so
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:39:55AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > > Please send patches as attached files.
> >
> > Since we are using now git, it is easier and logic send the patches in this
> > way, so the code of the patch can be included and modified in replies. You
> > only have to use gi
Greetings.
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 10:39:55 +0100 "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero"
wrote:
>
> > No, this will change the die() behaviour between all suckless projects.
>
> Then, change die in all the projects, it is the usual way of working with
> other issues, no?
Why should your taste change all
> No, this will change the die() behaviour between all suckless projects.
Then, change die in all the projects, it is the usual way of working with
other issues, no?
> Please send patches as attached files.
Since we are using now git, it is easier and logic send the patches in this
way, so the
Greetings.
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:40:16 +0100 "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero"
wrote:
> After a call to die the program exits and the shell take the control, so it
> is better for the user the shell begins in an new line, and it is better for
> the programmer don't have to explicitly add it in each
After a call to die the program exits and the shell take the control, so it
is better for the user the shell begins in an new line, and it is better for
the programmer don't have to explicitly add it in each call to die.
---
st.c | 45 +++--
1 file changed
11 matches
Mail list logo
