Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-22 Thread Claudio
If you have a vim-like interface to Chrome, the best way to edit text online is jsvi[0]. It need some improvement but works quite good. OTOH, Chrome will *never* allow the extensions to run local binary code like FireFox does. You'll have to use the NPAPI plugin to achieve this goal. Regards, Clau

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-21 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:46:46PM -0700, Suraj Kurapati wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Rob wrote: > > I usually use plain text mode and edit the email externally - I > > use vimperator, which is a Firefox plugin, and it allows you to > > edit text fields with a external editor. > > Un

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-21 Thread Suraj Kurapati
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Rob wrote: > I usually use plain text mode and edit the email externally - I > use vimperator, which is a Firefox plugin, and it allows you to > edit text fields with a external editor. Unfortunately the Chromium browser lacks an external editor plugin for HTML te

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-21 Thread Rob
On 11 April 2011 14:34, Bryan Bennett wrote: > Your new version of the patch seems to work *MUCH* better. In the couple > tests I've run, the random line noise I was getting before is much improved. > There's still some issues with curses / ncurses / slang applications (I've > yet to identify whic

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-11 Thread Bryan Bennett
>I've had a pop at tidying it up a bit, I'm not getting as many silly >characters filtered through, would you mind giving it a try with what >you were doing and seeing if it's any better? Your new version of the patch seems to work *MUCH* better. In the couple tests I've run, the random line noise

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-10 Thread Rob
On 5 April 2011 17:01, Bryan Bennett wrote: > is causing a lot of additional characters to be placed on > newlines, making actually getting what I want out of it rather difficult. I've had a pop at tidying it up a bit, I'm not getting as many silly characters filtered through, would you mind giv

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-09 Thread Bjartur Thorlacius
On 4/5/11, Bryan Bennett wrote: > C knowledge is rather low (I'm a python programmer...) so it's going Reading this line I felt an urge to reply with the words "Die in hell" alone. I'm going to punching uriel in the face now, for infecting me with mindless trölling. In especial considering you pro

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-05 Thread Bryan Bennett
While I like the premise of your xsel patch, it seems to be pretty rough in implementation (not that I'm complaining, I certainly can't do much better). It properly grabs the text from the terminal buffer, but the lack of utf-8 (or so I'm assuming) is causing a lot of additional characters to be pl

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-05 Thread Rob
On 4 April 2011 16:18, Bryan Bennett wrote: > While I understand wanting applications to adhere to the Unix > Philosophy, it seems to me that inputting and outputting text > is what a terminal essentially does and copying & pasting is > just a small extension of that role. I'd like to see a sane >

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-05 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Ethan Grammatikidis dixit (2011-04-05, 02:11): > On 4 Apr 2011, at 7:53 pm, Antoni Grzymala wrote: > > > > That's why I have the mod4-c shortcut – exactly for turning > > opera-copied links into a shift-insert insertable selection. > > Ah, you have mod4-c run something which copies clipboard to s

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-04 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On 4 Apr 2011, at 7:53 pm, Antoni Grzymala wrote: That's why I have the mod4-c shortcut – exactly for turning opera-copied links into a shift-insert insertable selection. Ah, you have mod4-c run something which copies clipboard to selection? There's a little prog in p9p which automatically c

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-04 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Ethan Grammatikidis dixit (2011-04-04, 17:23): > > In my standard X environment most programs accept the convention, > > that MMB *and* shift-insert insert the selection, while whichever > > program supports the clipboard it has some clipboard shortcut (and > > those two do not overlap). > > I ju

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-04 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On 4 Apr 2011, at 9:10 am, Antoni Grzymala wrote: In my standard X environment most programs accept the convention, that MMB *and* shift-insert insert the selection, while whichever program supports the clipboard it has some clipboard shortcut (and those two do not overlap). I just tested wit

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-04 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On 4 Apr 2011, at 2:02 pm, Kurt H Maier wrote: If middlemouse paste sucks on your hardware, buy new hardware. I'm in no hurry to change an efficient paradigm because someone got cheap buying a mouse. (Looking at you here, Ethan!) You were the one who said my laptops have their own pointing

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-04 Thread Bryan Bennett
While I understand wanting applications to adhere to the Unix Philosophy, it seems to me that inputting and outputting text is what a terminal essentially does and copying & pasting is just a small extension of that role. I'd like to see a sane way of copying & pasting with the keyboard, rather tha

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-04 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Peter John Hartman wrote: > Not at all.  Just make sure X forwarding is working properly and that tmux > cut places things in xclip or something like that associated with the right > host.  Ditto with urlviewer. You think that's a good idea? Setting up x11 forward

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-04 Thread Peter John Hartman
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 09:02:10AM -0400, Kurt H Maier wrote: > On 4/4/11, Peter John Hartman wrote: > > If you use tmux, you don't need either a urlLauncher function built into > > your xvt nor mouse cut-n-paste built into it. Just use their internal > > buffers, on the one hand, and bind a key t

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-04 Thread Steven Blatchford
On 19:59 Sun 03 Apr, ilf wrote: >3. I really like urxvt(1)s urlLauncher functionality. Copy+Pasting >URLs is a PITA, especially on laptops without a middle mouse button >for pasting. What do you all think about it? This is getting off-topic; if you like urlLauncher I suggest looking at the url-sele

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-04 Thread Kurt H Maier
On 4/4/11, Peter John Hartman wrote: > If you use tmux, you don't need either a urlLauncher function built into > your xvt nor mouse cut-n-paste built into it. Just use their internal > buffers, on the one hand, and bind a key to urlview or whatever to get > the other functionality. This is usele

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-04 Thread Peter John Hartman
> > 3. I really like urxvt(1)s urlLauncher functionality. Copy+Pasting > > URLs is a PITA, especially on laptops without a middle mouse button > > for pasting. What do you all think about it? > > Middle-button paste is (unfortunately) effectively brain-damaged for > at least half the hardwar

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-04 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Ethan Grammatikidis dixit (2011-04-04, 02:34): > XFCE terminal binds ctrl-shift-C/V to clipboard copy/paste. They're > not great bindings but they're memorable. Someone mentioned shift- > insert, was that for clipboard or selection paste? Shift-insert > reminds me of DOS edit.exe which used t

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-03 Thread Ethan Grammatikidis
On 3 Apr 2011, at 6:59 pm, ilf wrote: 2. alsamixer(1) behaves horribly. I dunno about anyone else, but alsamixer is one of only 2 curses programs I still use. :} Well, 3 really, I still have to use vi occasionally. 3. I really like urxvt(1)s urlLauncher functionality. Copy+Pasting URL

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-03 Thread Aurélien Aptel
Ok, I've tagged a new 0.1.1 version, the clipboard/version should be fixed. On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 9:02 PM, ilf wrote: > It just renders horribly slow, like downloading a GIF in the Ninetees. oh so it's just slow, there's no gfx bug? In that case, I'm aware of this.

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-03 Thread ilf
On 04-03 20:27, Aurélien Aptel wrote: 2. alsamixer(1) behaves horribly. Could you be more specific? Screenshots, stderr, etc. If you're using TERM=st, make sure you've install the terminfo entry, as explained in the faq. It just renders horribly slow, like downloading a GIF in the Ninetees.

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-03 Thread Aurélien Aptel
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Aurélien Aptel wrote: > I've also got mixed up while testing some stuff with Petr's BORDER Sorry, I meant Petr's utf8 clipboard patch. The result is copy/paste doesn't work...

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-03 Thread Aurélien Aptel
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:59 PM, ilf wrote: > 1. config.mk still sais VERSION = 0.0 fuck. I've also got mixed up while testing some stuff with Petr's BORDER patch and commited the wrong thing... Do I make a 0.1.1 fixed version or do I move the 0.1 tag to a fixed version? I only have to edit .hgtag

Re: [dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-03 Thread stanio
I gave st a try again these days. Is pretty stable. cool. * ilf [2011-04-03 20:00]: > On 04-03 02:06, Aurélien Aptel wrote: > >I've tagged v0.1 to tip. > 2. alsamixer(1) behaves horribly. same here. but I can live with the visual shit. Or you experience other oddities? > 3. I really like urxvt(

[dev] [st] 0.1 Feedback - Was: A few small patches

2011-04-03 Thread ilf
On 04-03 02:06, Aurélien Aptel wrote: I've tagged v0.1 to tip. 1. config.mk still sais VERSION = 0.0 2. alsamixer(1) behaves horribly. 3. I really like urxvt(1)s urlLauncher functionality. Copy+Pasting URLs is a PITA, especially on laptops without a middle mouse button for pasting. What do