Greetings.
On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 07:13:26 +0100 Carlos Torres wrote:
> maybe this is more appealing to the inquisition
>
> http://sprunge.us/GbCf
Sorry, I forgot to commit the xssstate.c. It's now there.
Sincerely,
Christoph Lohmann
maybe this is more appealing to the inquisition
http://sprunge.us/GbCf
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Carlos Torres wrote:
> Thanks 20h, i missed the part where xssstate.c was so here is what it
> could be
>
> http://sprunge.us/UGaB
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Christoph Lohmann
Thanks 20h, i missed the part where xssstate.c was so here is what it could
be
http://sprunge.us/UGaB
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> On Sat, 08 Dec 2012 21:48:52 +0100 Carlos Torres
> wrote:
> > On Dec 8, 2012 10:10 AM, "Christoph Lo
Greetings.
On Sat, 08 Dec 2012 21:48:52 +0100 Carlos Torres wrote:
> On Dec 8, 2012 10:10 AM, "Christoph Lohmann" <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> >
> > Greetings.
> >
> > On Sat, 08 Dec 2012 16:05:52 +0100 Carlos Torres
> wrote:
> > > What about xss, http://woozle.org/~neale/src/xss.html it doesn't pol
On Dec 8, 2012 10:10 AM, "Christoph Lohmann" <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
>
> Greetings.
>
> On Sat, 08 Dec 2012 16:05:52 +0100 Carlos Torres
wrote:
> > What about xss, http://woozle.org/~neale/src/xss.html it doesn't poll.
>
> It seems to expose the same functions but in a more hideous way. It is
> u
Greetings.
On Sat, 08 Dec 2012 16:05:52 +0100 Carlos Torres wrote:
> What about xss, http://woozle.org/~neale/src/xss.html it doesn't poll.
It seems to expose the same functions but in a more hideous way. It is
using the possibility to register a screensaver instead of having that
logic on
What about xss, http://woozle.org/~neale/src/xss.html it doesn't poll.
On Dec 8, 2012 2:09 AM, "Christoph Lohmann" <2...@r-36.net> wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> On Sat, 08 Dec 2012 08:02:33 +0100 Comrade DOS
> wrote:
> > Did you try use xautolock? What wrong with it?
>
> Xautolock has a sloccount of
Greetings.
On Sat, 08 Dec 2012 08:02:33 +0100 Comrade DOS wrote:
> Did you try use xautolock? What wrong with it?
Xautolock has a sloccount of 1470 vs. 331 for xgetlock. In those 1470
there is some IPC mechanism, various heuristics to detect states like a
newly started up server so it wo
Did you try use xautolock? What wrong with it?
2012/12/8 Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net>
> Greetings comrades,
>
> attached is a patched for slock to add a simple script for idle watching
> in your current X11 sessions. It is using xgetidle[0] for getting the
> X11 idle time.
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
Greetings comrades,
attached is a patched for slock to add a simple script for idle watching
in your current X11 sessions. It is using xgetidle[0] for getting the
X11 idle time.
Sincerely,
Christoph Lohmann
[0] http://git.suckless.org/xgetidle/
>From 319d24028a01fcf81e246ee44f2640938094a941 Mo
10 matches
Mail list logo
