maybe this is more appealing to the inquisition http://sprunge.us/GbCf
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Carlos Torres <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks 20h, i missed the part where xssstate.c was so here is what it > could be > > http://sprunge.us/UGaB > > > > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Christoph Lohmann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Greetings. >> >> On Sat, 08 Dec 2012 21:48:52 +0100 Carlos Torres <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > On Dec 8, 2012 10:10 AM, "Christoph Lohmann" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > Greetings. >> > > >> > > On Sat, 08 Dec 2012 16:05:52 +0100 Carlos Torres < >> [email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > > What about xss, http://woozle.org/~neale/src/xss.html it doesn't >> poll. >> > > >> > > It seems to expose the same functions but in a more hideous way. It >> is >> > > using the possibility to register a screensaver instead of having >> that >> > > logic on your own in a more understandable way. >> > >> > Registration of a screensaver is the whole purpose of the mit >> screensaver >> > extension. With it you avoid polling for idle and can manage it with >> xset. >> > Isn't this better and consumes less cpu. >> >> Now, with renaming xgetidle to xssstate[0] it’s possible to do all of >> this in a script. It does not poll, it waits for the time requested by >> the user. This may be used in other scenarios. The example script to in‐ >> voke slock is now in the xssstate repository. >> >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Christoph Lohmann >> >> [0] http://git.suckless.org/xssstate/ >> >> >> >
