Dnia 8 grudnia 2015 5:23 Eric Pruitt napisał(a):
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 03:25:05PM +0100, Jakub Lach wrote:
> > It has xft that I don't want, my terminus font doesn't work (or I haven't
> > figured the syntax), had to rewrite config.h
>
> Your terminus font settings might not work out-of-the-
On 7 December 2015 at 16:51, Jakub Lach wrote:
> What I'm trying to say, is that 6.1 is a little more
> POLA violating, than dwm releases used to be.
I understand your concerns and have a similar feeling that Xft brought
in some tumors into our software.
However the idea behind libdrw is to also
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 10:51:25AM -0500, Matthew of Boswell wrote:
> There is no end-user support here. Most of us don't want to spend our
> free time on it, and we don't want "help vampires" to feel welcome.
"help vampires"
nice
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 03:25:05PM +0100, Jakub Lach wrote:
> It has xft that I don't want, my terminus font doesn't work (or I haven't
> figured the syntax), had to rewrite config.h
Your terminus font settings might not work out-of-the-box, but now
everyone that wants to use dwm with languages th
Dnia 7 grudnia 2015 17:15 Matthew of Boswell
napisał(a):
> On Mon, 07 Dec 2015 16:51:55 +0100
> Jakub Lach wrote:
> > [...]than dwm releases used to be.
>
> I'm curious now... how long have you been using dwm? The last release
> before this was in 2011.
About 2008 I think.
On Mon, 07 Dec 2015 16:51:55 +0100
Jakub Lach wrote:
> [...]than dwm releases used to be.
I'm curious now... how long have you been using dwm? The last release
before this was in 2011.
--
Matt Boswell
Hey there,
2015-12-07 16:51 GMT+01:00, Matthew of Boswell
:
> Huh? What OS/distro are you guys using that you don't already have
> libxft? I have so many packages that rely on it.
Mainstream Linux distros fought with all their might against gcc to fit
their OS into the CD-ROM boundaries.
The funn
On 7 December 2015 at 15:51, Jakub Lach wrote:
> What I'm trying to say, is that 6.1 is a little more
> POLA violating, than dwm releases used to be.
I do think it a little unfortunate that dwm release numbering means
essentially nothing. The jump from 6.0 to 6.1 was far greater than 5.9
to 6.0 w
Dnia 7 grudnia 2015 16:16 FRIGN napisał(a):
> ...
Yeah, thanks. I'm aware of differences, I've rewrote
config.h, I've anticipated such response and I'm
(partially) okay with it. I've reverted to 6.0 too.
What I'm trying to say, is that 6.1 is a little more
POLA violating, than dwm releases us
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 16:14:10 +0100
"G.H." wrote:
> I also have problems with 6.1; it won't compile because of a lack of xft
> fonts on my machine, or, I think that's my problem.
Huh? What OS/distro are you guys using that you don't already have
libxft? I have so many packages that rely on it.
Hello,
For xft Terminus, I simply use "Terminus:bold:size=9", that
seems to work best, you should check "fc-list | grep Terminus"
to see if Terminus is in fontconfig fontpath (or whatever its called)
or else add it, like so "xset +fp ~/.fonts/terminus" or where ever
you have yours, with .xinitrc
On Mon, 07 Dec 2015 15:25:05 +0100
Jakub Lach wrote:
Hey Jakub,
> I'm grateful for maintaining this software, however my upgrade from 6.0->1
> brought me nothing but grumpiness unfortunately.
> It has xft that I don't want, my terminus font doesn't work (or I haven't
> figured the syntax), ha
I also have problems with 6.1; it won't compile because of a lack of xft
fonts on my machine, or, I think that's my problem.
I appreciate that DWM is a developer's tool and, in using it I should
have sufficient knowledge to address this issue, but..
I do like DWM and I'd would like to continu
Dnia 9 listopada 2015 0:45 Hiltjo Posthuma napisał(a):
> After a long time (dwm 6.0 was released on 2011-12-19) it is time for a new
> dwm release.
I'm grateful for maintaining this software, however my upgrade from 6.0->1
brought me nothing but grumpiness unfortunately.
It has xft that I don
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Brendan Desmond wrote:
> On 2015-11-09, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
>
> Hi Hiltjo, I noticed that in the latest release tarball from the Suckless
> web
> site, the line referring to $FREETYPEINC for OpenBSD in config.mk is
> uncommented, like so:
>
> # freetype
> FREETYP
On 2015-11-09, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
Build improvements:
- config.mk: add $FREETYPELIBS and $FREETYPEINC, simpler to override
(ports and *BSDs).
Hi Hiltjo, I noticed that in the latest release tarball from the Suckless web
site, the line referring to $FREETYPEINC for OpenBSD in config.mk is
Hi suckless developers!,
After a long time (dwm 6.0 was released on 2011-12-19) it is time for a new
dwm release. Thanks goes out to all the people involved at making the software
better in various ways!
Alot of things have changed, make sure to update your config.h and rebase the
wiki patches yo
17 matches
Mail list logo
