>> If we are going to use only in this file then maybe is better use the
>> snprintf
>> directly.
>
> +1 - that makes more sense.
Then, that is what we'll do.
Also, sin, I'm looking over your patches, and I'll try to add them tonight.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 04:29:23PM +0200, Roberto E. Vargas Caballero wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 09:19:41AM -0400, Galos, David wrote:
> > > OpenBSD defines strlcpy function, and the declaration is a bit different
> > > of the static declartion found in tar.c. The duplication of symbol name
>
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 09:19:41AM -0400, Galos, David wrote:
> > OpenBSD defines strlcpy function, and the declaration is a bit different
> > of the static declartion found in tar.c. The duplication of symbol name
> > with different type (one extern and other static, one returning int and
> > the
> OpenBSD defines strlcpy function, and the declaration is a bit different
> of the static declartion found in tar.c. The duplication of symbol name
> with different type (one extern and other static, one returning int and
> the other returning size_t) caused tar couldn't compile in OpenBSD.
Since
From: "Roberto E. Vargas Caballero"
OpenBSD defines strlcpy function, and the declaration is a bit different
of the static declartion found in tar.c. The duplication of symbol name
with different type (one extern and other static, one returning int and
the other returning size_t) caused tar could
