> OpenBSD defines strlcpy function, and the declaration is a bit different > of the static declartion found in tar.c. The duplication of symbol name > with different type (one extern and other static, one returning int and > the other returning size_t) caused tar couldn't compile in OpenBSD.
Since nothing else in sbase makes use of strlcpy I don't think that it's worth librarizing like this. I did it for consistency in `archive`, as I populated the Header. It might be better for now to just call it strlmov, or define a macro STRLCPY.
