Le 28/08/2017 à 21:04, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 07:22:58PM +0200, Stéphane Aulery wrote:
Le 28/08/2017 à 11:44, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 02:41:42AM +0200, Stéphane Aulery wrote:
Le 27/08/2017 à 19:29, sylvain.bertr
Le 28/08/2017 à 11:44, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 02:41:42AM +0200, Stéphane Aulery wrote:
Le 27/08/2017 à 19:29, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 05:27:24PM +0200, Stéphane Aulery wrote:
My idea is how to reconcile the
Le 27/08/2017 à 19:29, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 05:27:24PM +0200, Stéphane Aulery wrote:
My idea is how to reconcile the implementation of programs and a kernel
that is a multiplexer like plan9 with a language and a sound compilation
environment like that of
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 01:31:42PM +, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 02:58:34PM +0200, Stéphane Aulery wrote:
> > Go and Oberon are better than this crazy ecosystem.
> > They solve the problem of compilation and object orientation.
>
> go is
t should be for a final software, a prototype, or non-redistributed
administration scripts. As long as they are much higher-level languages
they must also be used only in the highest layer of a system.
It is above all a problem of coherence of ideas and of will. A system can only
be coherent if it is directed by one (or two) people. Distributions are not
operating systems of this type (+ final softwares) and it's the mess.
--
Stéphane Aulery
tell, there isn't. But I could have missed something, given
how many unrelated results `suckless "less"` pulls up :)
Maybe not suckless, but I use most.
See
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/81129/what-are-the-differences-between-most-more-and-less#81131
--
Stéphane Aulery
