Re: [dev] Text-only browser that sucks less?

2014-06-29 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 06/29/14 at 07:56pm, Nick wrote: > Quoth Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe: > > Beyond rendering pages, the biggest > > challenge seems to me to lie in coming up with a more intelligent > > method of selecting links than the usual crufty vi/emacs/Lynx-style > > interfaces. > > I always liked the way eli

Re: [dev] Microblogging?

2014-05-27 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 05/27/14 at 12:54pm, Martti Kühne wrote: > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Manolo Martínez > wrote: > > On 05/23/14 at 11:15am, Dimitris Papastamos wrote: > >> hiro is microblogging on this ml. > > > > On 05/23/14 at 10:52am, Carlos Torres wrote: > >>

Re: [dev] Microblogging?

2014-05-23 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 05/23/14 at 11:15am, Dimitris Papastamos wrote: > hiro is microblogging on this ml. On 05/23/14 at 10:52am, Carlos Torres wrote: > microcomment "yay" On 05/23/14 at 04:53pm, Martti Kühne wrote: > "some people" Thank you for the helpful set of replies, guys. Manolo

[dev] Microblogging?

2014-05-23 Thread Manolo Martínez
Do you guys hang out at any microblogging platform? I used to use identi.ca, but the move to pump.io put me off somewhat -- the client I was used to use didn't work anymore, etc. Also, as far as I can tell, there's not much going on there these days. Anyway, is everyone (who is somewhere) at Twitt

Re: Skype replacements (was:[dev][project] soap - a simple xdg-open replacement)

2014-05-04 Thread Manolo Martínez
> telephone Video calls are nice, though.

Re: Skype replacementes (was:[dev][project] soap - a simple xdg-open replacement)

2014-05-04 Thread Manolo Martínez
Thanks everyone. M

Re: [dev][project] soap - a simple xdg-open replacement

2014-05-04 Thread Manolo Martínez
> > > You are not using Skype really, right? I hope I am just unable to > > > properly decode the sarcasm here. > > > > Alex, don't you have relatives or friends who don't know better? Or do > > you succeed in educating them to use better solutions? No sarcasm, I'm > > really curious :) > > Yes,

Re: [dev][project] soap - a simple xdg-open replacement

2014-05-04 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 05/04/14 at 01:04pm, Alexander Huemer wrote: > You are not using Skype really, right? I hope I am just unable to > properly decode the sarcasm here. Alex, don't you have relatives or friends who don't know better? Or do you succeed in educating them to use better solutions? No sarcasm, I'm r

Re: [dev] tiny pdf viewer (with vim key shortcuts)

2014-05-01 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 05/01/14 at 12:25pm, Sam Dodrill wrote: > Have you looked into Zathura? http://pwmt.org/projects/zathura/ That's the one I use. I should check mupdf again; I didn't like it the first time around.

Re: [dev] [dwm] trayless workflow

2014-04-26 Thread Manolo Martínez
> I just want to > know what what is the alternative way to monitor activity of > applications which I usually monitor with the tray icons. I find that urgency hints are more than enough for irc. You probably need to instruct your irc client to issue them (e.g. in irssi/config: "bell_beeps=yes") a

Re: [dev] What is bad with Python

2014-03-04 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 03/04/14 at 08:37am, FRIGN wrote: > No wonder, given Numpy and Scipy are mostly written in C and Fortran ;). That is true. As an aside, apparently Julia scientific ibraries are mostly written in Julia, which makes me wonder. > Moreover, from what I understand, you actually use special types >

Re: [dev] What is bad with Python

2014-03-04 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 03/04/14 at 07:49am, FRIGN wrote: > On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 09:14:05 +0100 > Silvan Jegen wrote: > > My biggest gripe with the language is the absence of static type > > checking at compile time. > In some cases, Python is up to 50% slower than well-written C, but to > be fair, it does the memory

Re: [dev] [dwm] Fullscreen windows losing focus

2014-02-19 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 02/20/14 at 11:52am, Chris Down wrote: > I submitted the attached patch to the review queue. I didn't test it > much, but it works for me. Thanks a lot, Chris. I hadn't got around to trying it out myself. I'll patch my dwm today (after a presentation I have this morning) and let you know. M

Re: [dev] [dwm] Fullscreen windows losing focus

2014-02-19 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 02/19/14 at 09:20pm, Chris Down wrote: > On 2014-02-19 14:09:26 +0100, Manolo Martínez wrote: > > When, e.g., zathura is in fullscreen mode, one can change focus to > > another window while zathura remains on screen. This can > > be disorienting. Is this a problem with

[dev] [dwm] Fullscreen windows losing focus

2014-02-19 Thread Manolo Martínez
Hello, When, e.g., zathura is in fullscreen mode, one can change focus to another window while zathura remains on screen. This can be disorienting. Is this a problem with zathura, or something that can be patched in dwm? (There is at least one easy workaround: using monocle without bar instead of

Re: [dev] New utility "when"

2013-12-11 Thread Manolo Martínez
fish has $ ssh user@host; and xmessage 'Connected'; or xmessage 'Problems!' Is this what you try to do with "when", or am I missing something? (Apart from the fact that many of you consider that fish sucks). Manolo On 12/11/13 at 07:32pm, Dimitris Zervas wrote: > @nicholas: Sorry, I didn't see

Re: [dev][announce] slm - music curation

2013-11-28 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 11/28/13 at 08:56am, Raphaël Proust wrote: > Two things that often break music db managers are: > - albums with different artists, and > - tracks with collaborating artists. > > Is it possible to: > - include the whole album under all of the artists who have a track on > said album? and > - c

Re: [dev] suckless shell prompt?

2013-11-25 Thread Manolo Martínez
> > I know a few people who are happily using > > fish (which sucks), but at least it shows that people don't necessarily > > care about POSIX semantics in their shell. > > Do these people really use fish as /bin/sh or do they use it as their > interactive shell? The former is _very_ scary, the l

Re: Tags as tags (Was: [dev] Desktop warping for DWM?)

2013-11-15 Thread Manolo Martínez
> You should give the alternative > bindings a try for a couple of weeks and see if you get a more > complica^W powerfu^W^W different workflow. Will do :)

Re: Tags as tags (Was: [dev] Desktop warping for DWM?)

2013-11-15 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 11/15/13 at 11:14am, Chris Down wrote: > For my work, I find > thinking of the tags as separate desktops is usually the way that I end > up using them (occasionally I display multiple tags at the same time, > but I don't think of that as being something I do regularly). Yes, same here. I'm und

Tags as tags (Was: [dev] Desktop warping for DWM?)

2013-11-14 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 11/14/13 at 05:57pm, Raphaël Proust wrote: > dwm doesn't have “desktop”s. dwm has tags (by default 9 of them, > although editing config.h can change that) and views (only 2: the > current view and the alternate view). See > http://www.wongdev.com/blog/2013/01/24/dwm-tags-are-not-workspaces/ > fo

Re: [dev] Launching new terminals in $PWD

2013-10-18 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 10/18/13 at 07:32pm, koneu wrote: > On Oct 18, 2013, at 7:26 PM, Noah Birnel wrote: > > And what is $PWD from the context of a window manager? > Exactly what I was thinking while reading this discussion. > What do you expect your WM's working directory to be? > Your current terminal's? The (she

Re: [dev] [st][patch] scrollback buffer

2013-10-18 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 10/18/13 at 05:01pm, Edgaras wrote: > > On 16/10/2013, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > > > I've implemented a (limited) scrollback buffer for st. Thanks to v4hn > > > for testing and improving first versions. > > > As for scrollback in terminal, at first it seemed very annoying as I was uses > t

Re: [dev][dwm] Launching new terminals in $PWD

2013-10-18 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 10/18/13 at 03:05pm, Alexander S. wrote: > 2013/10/18 Raphaël Proust : > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Manolo Martínez > > wrote: > >> On 10/18/13 at 06:12pm, Chris Down wrote: > >>> On 2013-10-18 12:03, Manolo Martínez wrote: > >>> En

Re: [dev][dwm] Launching new terminals in $PWD

2013-10-18 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 10/18/13 at 06:12pm, Chris Down wrote: > On 2013-10-18 12:03, Manolo Martínez wrote: > > > I guess what you want is the pwd of the client that currently has > > > focus… I also need something like that for plumb(1)ing purposes > > > > That's probably what

Re: [dev][dwm] Launching new terminals in $PWD

2013-10-18 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 10/18/13 at 10:49am, Raphaël Proust wrote: > I guess what you want is the pwd of the client that currently has > focus… I also need something like that for plumb(1)ing purposes That's probably what I want, yes. Thanks. > (relative file paths not resolving correctly otherwise). I didn't > man

Re: [dev][dwm] Launching new terminals in $PWD

2013-10-18 Thread Manolo Martínez
ess this is "the dwm and dmenu list" for me, which explains, but doesn't excuse, my forgetfulness. > > On 2013-10-18 11:14, Manolo Martínez wrote: > > Still, I wonder, wouldn't it be possible to use config.h to bind a key > > combination to, say, "urxvt -

[dev] Launching new terminals in $PWD

2013-10-18 Thread Manolo Martínez
Hello, I was trying to create a shortcut to launch new terminals in my current working directory. I've seen there's a two year-old thread, and a patch, about this, which probably means that the kind of easy solutions I've been trying cannot work. Still, I wonder, wouldn't it be possible to use co

Re: [dev] music db editor

2013-10-16 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 10/15/13 at 05:10pm, Martti Kühne wrote: > 3.: I don't have any need to collect metadata about my music I run off mpd, > and That's probably because you don't use portable media players. Most of those are much better at displaying metadata trees than at letting you navigate directory structure

Re: [dev] music db editor

2013-10-12 Thread Manolo Martínez
> > on the files to be tagged. Does anyone here use another program for this > > purpose? > > http://musicbrainz.org/doc/MusicBrainz_Picard > Thanks, I'll give it a try.

Re: [dev] music db editor

2013-10-12 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 10/12/13 at 11:35am, Rob wrote: > On 12 October 2013 08:16, Daniel Bryan wrote: > > > > I did once start (and abandon) a tool that did a small part of this: it > > would examine the tags in my music folder and identify: > > > > * files that weren't organised correctly into folders by artist and

Re: [dev] mail clients

2013-06-10 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 06/10/13 at 01:20pm, Andrew Hills wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:12:57 +0100 Michael Stevens > wrote: > > Are there any mail clients that don't suck? > > Mutt for CLI, Claws Mail for GUI. I don't think either of them suck. > I always assumed that "suckless" was a nod to mutt's slogan: "All

Re: [dev] lynx?

2013-05-28 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 05/28/13 at 03:43pm, v4hn wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:06:52PM +0200, markus schnalke wrote: > > these days, lynx was often mentioned when a text browser was meant. > > Is there really someone (apart from mirabilos) who uses lynx? > I use elinks. I've never managed to get lynx to play we

Re: [dev] Suckless generic diagram creation software?

2013-02-06 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 02/06/13 at 03:40pm, Peter Hartman wrote: > 2013/2/6 Manolo Martínez : > > On 02/06/13 at 03:29pm, Peter Hartman wrote: > >> LaTeX > >> > > I use and love LaTeX, but LaTeX is *not* lightweight. > > Depends on the measure, but it is lighter both in terms

Re: [dev] Suckless generic diagram creation software?

2013-02-06 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 02/06/13 at 03:29pm, Peter Hartman wrote: > LaTeX > I use and love LaTeX, but LaTeX is *not* lightweight. > 2013/2/6 Lee Fallat : > > Hey suckless fans, > > > > Does anyone know of some lightweight generic diagram software? So far all > > I've found are bloated programs that pull in gnome/kde

Re: [dev] Focus previously focused window

2012-12-13 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 12/13/12 at 03:20pm, Eric Pruitt wrote: > Hey Manolo, > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 03:04:01PM -0500, Manolo Martínez wrote: > > I was wondering if anyone knows of a patch that provides the means to > > return to the previously focused window (if it exists). That is, fo

Re: [dev] Focus previously focused window

2012-12-13 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 12/13/12 at 10:16pm, Andreas Amann wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 03:04:01PM -0500, Manolo Martínez wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I was wondering if anyone knows of a patch that provides the means to > > return to the previously focused window (if it exists). That

[dev] Focus previously focused window

2012-12-13 Thread Manolo Martínez
Hello, I was wondering if anyone knows of a patch that provides the means to return to the previously focused window (if it exists). That is, for example, if I'm on window1 and launch a window2, MOD+p (say) would take me back to window1. Thanks Manolo --

Re: [dev] Minimal distributions

2012-11-25 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 11/25/12 at 09:02pm, hiro wrote: > FUCK OFF THEN You probably think you come across as a refreshingly-no-nonsense kind of person. You don't.

Re: [dev] [st] Terminus font

2012-11-25 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 11/25/12 at 03:48pm, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > But really, to make it easier, something like xfontsel(1), but without > any KDE or Gnome dependency is needed. It could be a wrapper script us‐ > ing xfd(1) and fc‐list(1). Any volunteers? > xfontsel has Gnome or KDE dependencies?

Re: [dev] I'm back

2012-11-17 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 11/17/12 at 01:15pm, Newton Smartt wrote: > What's wrong with Arch? systemd is probably frowned upon around here.

Re: [dev] I'm back

2012-11-17 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 11/17/12 at 01:57pm, Jamie Bragg wrote: > I rarely use the mouse functionality of the dwm bar and wouldn't miss it. I > would kind of miss the dwm bar if it went away, simply because I'd have to > find another solution. > If this is something like a poll, I concur: no mouse, yes bar. M

Re: [dev] I don't want to live on this planet anymore

2012-10-31 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 10/31/12 at 07:47pm, Brandon Invergo wrote: > Obviously, the assignment was simple for anyone with a couple of brain > cells to rub together but your professor wouldn't be able to assess any > of your programming capability from your solution, only that you've > somehow managed to wrap your head

Re: [dev][dwm] A window without focus

2012-10-26 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 10/26/12 at 12:33pm, Hugues Moretto-Viry wrote: > I'm pretty sure he's using dwm... > I'm sorry. I thought as much would have been obvious. My bad. M

[dev] A window without focus

2012-10-25 Thread Manolo Martínez
Hello, I have a cronjob that launches a window with notify-send "Low Battery" when, well, the battery is low. Is there a way to prevent this window from stealing focus? Thanks Manolo --

Re: [dev] fceux in fullscreen

2012-07-04 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 07/05/12 at 02:14am, Martti Kühne wrote: > Idea: match a rule against fceux. implement a new kind of rule for floating > windows along with that and "squeeze" it to the background. there was a fix > against floating windows landing underneath fullscreen or stacked windows on > this list that mad

Re: [dev] fceux in fullscreen

2012-07-04 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 07/05/12 at 12:35am, Eckehard Berns wrote: > Ok, I'm dump. I tried three times to describe what happens here without > boring everyone to death - and I failed. So I deleted everything I > wrote. The gist of it is that fceux needs to use some hacks to get the > best results with SDL for its use c

Re: [dev] fceux in fullscreen

2012-07-04 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 07/04/12 at 11:01pm, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote: > I don't understand why exactly fceux creates this window, though. > Never mind, thanks a lot for your help. I'll find some workaround or other. Cheers, Manolo --

Re: [dev] fceux in fullscreen

2012-07-03 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 07/03/12 at 06:36pm, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote: > On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Manolo Martínez > wrote: > > None of that works: dwm keys are, as I say, unresponsive in fceux > > fullscreen. When trying sleep + xprop, xprop complains that it can't > > "gra

Re: [dev] fceux in fullscreen

2012-07-03 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 07/03/12 at 06:06pm, Eckehard Berns wrote: > > I'm sorry, I know similar questions have been posted before, but I > > cannot seem to find my way around this issue: when I use fceux's > > fullscreen option, a black square occupies part of the upper left corner > > of the screen. [...] > > Are yo

Re: [dev] fceux in fullscreen

2012-07-03 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 07/03/12 at 05:40pm, uki wrote: > 2012/7/3 Manolo Martínez : > > The thing is, if xprop is running, I cannot focus the fceux window (so > > as to toggle fullscreen). On the other hand, if I am in fceux > > fullscreen, I cannot run xprop (I cannot go to another tag, or d

Re: [dev] fceux in fullscreen

2012-07-03 Thread Manolo Martínez
Hi, thanks for your reply On 07/03/12 at 05:18pm, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote: > On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Manolo Martínez > wrote: > > Also, this square is slightly bigger than the unmaximized fceux, so I > > don't really know where is that coming from. How can I ge

[dev] fceux in fullscreen

2012-07-03 Thread Manolo Martínez
I'm sorry, I know similar questions have been posted before, but I cannot seem to find my way around this issue: when I use fceux's fullscreen option, a black square occupies part of the upper left corner of the screen. While in fullscreen, dwm keybindings are unresponsive. Also, this square is sl

Re: [dev] dwm tip changes

2012-06-24 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 06/24/12 at 11:01am, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > > On 23 June 2012 20:06, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > >> Also, dwm now disallows resizing/moving/float fullscreen windows, as > >> this doesn't seem very useful anyways. > But if there are many such use cases I might reconsider this decision. > I used t

Re: [dev] changing sizes in the master area

2012-05-14 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 05/14/12 at 01:29pm, Uli Armbruster wrote: > * Manolo Martínez [14.05.2012 13:24]: > > Hello, > > > > An unpatched dwm cannot change the sizes of windows in the master area, can > > it? > > > > Thanks > > M > > If you mean changing the

Re: [dev] changing sizes in the master area

2012-05-14 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 05/14/12 at 12:32pm, Connor Lane Smith wrote: > Hey, > > On 14 May 2012 12:29, Uli Armbruster wrote: > > If you mean changing the size vertically (e.g. with two widows in the > > master area), then no > > You can, by adding or removing windows from master as appropriate. :p > > cls > :) --

[dev] changing sizes in the master area

2012-05-14 Thread Manolo Martínez
Hello, An unpatched dwm cannot change the sizes of windows in the master area, can it? Thanks M --

Re: [dev] [dwm] systray in upstream dwm?

2012-04-05 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 04/05/12 at 10:44am, Kurt H Maier wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 02:24:20AM -0600, Jeremy Jackins wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:12 AM, KIMURA Masaru wrote: > > >> however in my opinion a system tray is > > >> not necessary and should not be added to mainline. > > > > > > if you don't mi

Re: [dev] some wmiirc scripts

2012-03-24 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 03/24/12 at 08:45pm, hiro wrote: > > Why is this better than using monocle mode? I also have a small screen and I > > use monocle a lot. > > monocle doesn't show the window titles of the unselected windows. > Right. Just as a suggestion, committing to memory the windows one has under each tag

Re: [dev] some wmiirc scripts

2012-03-24 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 03/24/12 at 03:08pm, papoanaya wrote: > I use wmii as well, it is because it works well in small screens. I use it on > my Eee 701SD which has a 7 inch screen. The killer feature is its ability to > stack windows in stacked mode. This allows to move across windows in a single > workspace as i

Re: [dev] [dwm] Why am I having a gap between the master window and the others?

2012-02-16 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 02/16/12 at 07:58pm, pmarin wrote: > screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/rAUfL.png No idea, but your screenshot would have made a nice electroclash CD cover back in the early 2000s :)

Re: [dev] monsterwm - 700 SLOC dwm fork

2011-12-31 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 12/31/11 at 12:02pm, Ryan Mullen wrote: > > crux is a linux distribution that I hate markedly less than some others, > > but it's got significant problems of its own -- specifically during > > installation.  when they come up with a test regimen for their > > perpetually-in-alpha 64-bit release

Re: [dev] monsterwm - 700 SLOC dwm fork

2011-12-31 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 12/30/11 at 03:35pm, Kurt H Maier wrote: > I love arch linux's facility for coralling all the nitwits into one > self-contained forum. It just sucks when some of the retardation leaks > out into the real world. > > I think it would be better if it were called Genbuntoo or something > so ther

Re: [dev] wmii falling out of favor

2011-12-22 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 12/22/11 at 04:47pm, hiro wrote: > lol, people on suckless don't actually use their window managers, they > brag about it and rewrite it and rewrite it and rewrite it. It's more > of a hobby than a necessity for them. > The claim is that when this people finish rewriting dwm then go write their

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0

2011-12-19 Thread Manolo Martínez
Connor, thanks for replying. On 12/19/11 at 04:40pm, Connor Lane Smith wrote: > On 19 December 2011 16:39, Manolo Martínez wrote: > > A question regarding this functionality -- feel free to forward me to > > documentation, if there is such --. If I use Mod1-i and have two wind

Re: [dev] dwm 6.0

2011-12-19 Thread Manolo Martínez
Hi, thanks for the new version! On 12/19/11 at 04:16pm, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > - the return of the nmaster functionality (Mod1-i, Mod1-d) A question regarding this functionality -- feel free to forward me to documentation, if there is such --. If I use Mod1-i and have two windows in the master c

Re: [dev] [dwm] Fullscreen programs in tile mode

2011-11-23 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 11/23/11 at 10:11am, Nick wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:04:22AM +0100, Manolo Martínez wrote: > > Btw, I've just noticed that residual (an emulator needed to play Grim > > Fandango) > > will not honour the request to toggle floating -- if it is floating. LyX, &

Re: [dev] [dwm] Fullscreen programs in tile mode

2011-11-23 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 11/23/11 at 09:51am, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote: > IIRC dwm automatically floats windows the size of the screen (and F11 > makes most windows resize to cover the whole screen) as well as > windows with a fullscreen hint set. You can modify dwm.c to have > "fullscreen" windows tiled by default. >

Re: [dev] [dwm] Fullscreen programs in tile mode

2011-11-23 Thread Manolo Martínez
ks a lot, and sorry for the noise. Manolo > * Manolo Martínez [2011-11-23 10:11]: > > The question is, is there any way to convince a program to deploy its > > fullscreen mode inside a window which I can then tile or monocle as I see > > fit? > -- > stanio_ > --

[dev] [dwm] Fullscreen programs in tile mode

2011-11-23 Thread Manolo Martínez
Hello, In some programs I use frequently, their fullscreen mode is interesting in that it is stripped down of menu bars, icons and the like. For instance, LyX, a LaTeX frontend I use sometimes, is like that. This is good if you know your keybindings: no screen wasted in stuff you don't need. OTOH

Re: [dev] Suckless Desktop Environment

2011-11-07 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 11/07/11 at 09:34pm, Christoph Lohmann wrote: > But yes, the users we want in suckless should be sophisticated > enough to find this out on their own. We are taking the subset of > users from the Ubuntu[0]-educated crowd and filter them for the > real suckless users, that could spread our ideas.

Re: [dev] [dwm] nicer web (was: 2000 SLOC)

2011-11-03 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 11/03/11 at 09:14am, Nick wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 10:03:20AM +0100, Pierre Chapuis wrote: > the technology. It's the people who are charged with "web > design" in our brand obsessed world. Making the web > increasingly more difficult to use and more unpleasant for > us all. And I don't

Re: [dev] [dmenu] weird arrows behaviour

2011-11-02 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 11/02/11 at 01:52pm, Swiatoslaw Gal wrote: > Left (back) arrow works in dmenu well. Right (forward) does not do anything. > Is it a bug or feature? > It works here. Manolo --

Re: [dev] Linux sucks!

2011-10-28 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 10/28/11 at 01:35pm, hiro wrote: > > That's because Ubuntu sucks only marginally less than Windows > > > > Huh? Ubuntu sucks a lot more. I'm just a user of some suckless software, but anyway: if "suck" in this thread is used with the semi-technical sense of "not abiding by the suckless philos

Re: [dev] Focusing on windows by name

2011-10-26 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 10/26/11 at 12:32pm, Bastien Dejean wrote: > No, this is not equivalent because the following command: > > wmctrl -xa mutt > > activates the first client matching the given 'title'. > > You could rather do: > > #! /bin/sh > > wid=$(lsw -l | grep -m 1 "$@" | cut -d ' ' -f 1) > >

Re: [dev] Focusing on windows by name

2011-10-26 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 10/26/11 at 05:51pm, Patrick Haller wrote: > > > > In openbox I have a key bound to the following:"wmctrl -xa mutt || > > urxvt -name mutt -e mutt" > > xlsclients | grep -q mutt || urxvt -e mutt > xdotool seems to work: "xdotool search "mutt" windowactivate | urxvt -e mutt" Manolo --

Re: [dev] Focusing on windows by name

2011-10-26 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 10/26/11 at 05:51pm, Patrick Haller wrote: > > In openbox I have a key bound to the following:"wmctrl -xa mutt || > > urxvt -name mutt -e mutt" > > xlsclients | grep -q mutt || urxvt -e mutt > Thanks, Patrick, this does half of what I want: it launches mutt only if there is no previous mutt wi

[dev] Focusing on windows by name

2011-10-26 Thread Manolo Martínez
Dear all, In openbox I have a key bound to the following:"wmctrl -xa mutt || urxvt -name mutt -e mutt" The idea is not to have many instances of mutt lying around -- my key raises a "mutt" window if there is one, or launches it if there isn't. wmctrl does not speak to dwm, if I understand it corr

Re: [dev] Anti-GPL hipsters

2011-10-24 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 10/24/11 at 10:30am, Kurt H Maier wrote: > > users don't give a shit about software licensing > I do. > > -- > # Kurt H Maier > --

Re: [dev] Ranger, a textbased filemanager

2011-10-23 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 10/23/11 at 01:08pm, Ricardo Catalinas Jiménez wrote: > I found this project in the Arch Linux forums: > > https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=93025 > > I bet someone is gonna start with Python is not suckless, anyway, I like > the concept of a filemanager with 3 columns. FWIW this is

Re: [dev] st features that'd be nice

2011-10-18 Thread Manolo Martínez
On 10/18/11 at 03:13pm, Stefan Mark wrote: > On 18.10.2011 13:15, Peter John Hartman wrote: > > Here's a feature request that should go in first: make st usable. > > > For me, performance is the main issue. Drawing of 'mc' on higher > resolutions (1600x1200 or 1920x1080) tooks about 10s (sometimes