> package to the effect that, if someone thinks installing a binary dwm
> package is a good idea, they can fuck right off and never come to
> #suckless for "support"?
> --
> # Kurt H Maier
>
>
--
Don Harper, RHCE
ecause of it.
Thanks for the help, and the great software!
don
--
.........
. Don Harper, RHCE . A friend can tell you things you don't want to .
. d...@donharper.org.
;> for those, who wanted to build a lightweight Linux/BSD environment: there
> >> were no lightweight graphical web browsers and no lightweight word
> >> processors. The situation with web browsers gets improved by surf and uzbl
> >> developers. But what about word processing? Do you have any suggestions on
> >> the original problem?
> >
> > Well usbl or surf aren't really lightweight, they only appear to be.
> > (The binaries for themselves are lightweight, but that doesn't tell
> > you on which mountain of complexity they rely on). I think writing a
> > decent less sucking word processor is much more achievable than
> > writing a lightweight browser. So this sounds like a good idea.
> >
> >> P.S.: Sorry for this post being so enormous, but I wanted to sum up my
> >> efforts for somebody who would like to solve the same problem.
> >
> > Thanks, next time in plain text please...
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Anselm
> >
> >
>
--
Don Harper, RHCE
no lightweight word
> processors. The situation with web browsers gets improved by surf and uzbl
> developers. But what about word processing? Do you have any suggestions on
> the original problem?
>
>
>
> P.S.: Sorry for this post being so enormous, but I wanted to sum up my
> efforts for somebody who would like to solve the same problem.
>
> --
> wbr, Илембитов
--
Don Harper, RHCE
as been solved, please
> let me know! I use dwm-5.4.1.
--
.........
. Don Harper, RHCE . A friend can tell you things.
. d...@duckland.org . you don't want to tell .
. www.donharper.org . yourself. - Frances Ward Weller .
