2022-04-28 9:38 GMT+02:00, Страхиња Радић :
> In my opinion, dark mode is unnecessary and favored by mainstream
> "webdevs".
>
Divide et impera (light vs dark mode) is the easiest solution they
could come up for soothing the look'n'feel hell in which desktop
vendors throwed themselves into.
On April 28, 2022 12:36:34 PM CDT, Greg Minshall wrote:
>Robert,
>
>i wonder if this SO exchange might be familiar:
>
>https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/368803/bash-seems-to-be-in-special-mode
>
>
>i just ran into something similar, where typing into the shell gave odd
>character
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:14:14 +0200
Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
Dear Hiltjo,
> Sure I don't mind you added them back.
> With the inverted colors they are visible here.
alright, cool. :)
Thanks also for adding the dark theme.
With best regards
Laslo
On 22/04/28 01:44, Robert Winkler wrote:
>
> usually, I am using the fish
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AQobpqySAU
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu Apr 28, 2022 at 11:48 AM CDT, Страхиња Радић wrote:
> On 22/04/15 07:08, Robert Winkler wrote:
> > Hi, according to the st Status, UTF-8 should be working. Much needed for
> > multilingual typing with ú, ü, ß, µ, ¿ etc.
> > However, I only get 00e9 if I type é; anything, I need to specify in
On 22/04/28 06:48, Страхиња Радић wrote:
> May I ask what shell are you using inside st? The only problem I noticed so
> far
> with my script, which uses xdotool(1) to type characters, is when I am using
> it
> while st is specifically executing mksh as a shell. With bash, dash and zsh
> emoji
Robert,
i wonder if this SO exchange might be familiar:
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/368803/bash-seems-to-be-in-special-mode
i just ran into something similar, where typing into the shell gave odd
characters (or, the "(arg: 1)" prompt). in this case, for *me*, (*)
bash
On 22/04/15 07:08, Robert Winkler wrote:
> Hi, according to the st Status, UTF-8 should be working. Much needed for
> multilingual typing with ú, ü, ß, µ, ¿ etc.
> However, I only get 00e9 if I type é; anything, I need to specify in
> config.h?
> Best, Robert
Liks I said, I only use:
- lo
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 12:19:07PM +0200, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 08:34:36 +0600
> NRK wrote:
>
> Dear NRK,
>
> > Recently noticed that the dwm and st logo was removed from their
> > homepages[0][1].
> >
> > I was wondering if there's any specific reason for that, or if there
Quoting Страхиња Радић (2022-04-28 05:28:29)
> On 22/04/28 12:19, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> > What do the others think?
>
> I also like them, I think they contribute to overall visual identity of
> suckless programs and suckless.org and should be reincorporated into the
> website.
I think the logo
Quoting Страхиња Радић (2022-04-28 01:43:26)
> On 22/04/26 03:59, Robert Winkler wrote:
> > To make a long story short: The input of UTF-8 characters with st needs
> > an IBus daemon
>
> No, it doesn't.
Well, I had the same problem on 3 computers running dwm/st. On a 4th,
the UTF-8 input (é,ñ,ü,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 01:06:05PM +0200, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> #main img[src$=svg] {
> filter: invert(1);
> }
>
> All within #main that are svg's are inverted in dark mode.
> Granted it makes use of a filter, which is not supported everywhere,
> but given prefers-color
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:38:09 +0200
Страхиња Радић wrote:
Dear Страхиња,
> This can be remedied with CSS which applies white background to logos
> (perhaps with some padding: to also give a bit of a
> border).
>
> In my opinion, dark mode is unnecessary and favored by mainstream
> "webdevs".
I
On 28.04.22 12:19, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 08:34:36 +0600
NRK wrote:
Dear NRK,
Recently noticed that the dwm and st logo was removed from their
homepages[0][1].
I was wondering if there's any specific reason for that, or if there's
plan for a new logo(s)?
I atleast really l
On 22/04/28 12:19, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> What do the others think?
I also like them, I think they contribute to overall visual identity of
suckless programs and suckless.org and should be reincorporated into the
website.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 13:53:54 +0600
NRK wrote:
Dear NRK,
> Ah, that makes sense. But wouldn't it make sense to remove the logos
> from *all* are projects then?
>
> Also since the logos are just svgs, I *think* it should be possible to
> override the color of the "fill" dynmaically via css (?) If
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 08:34:36 +0600
NRK wrote:
Dear NRK,
> Recently noticed that the dwm and st logo was removed from their
> homepages[0][1].
>
> I was wondering if there's any specific reason for that, or if there's
> plan for a new logo(s)?
>
> I atleast really liked the current logos, as th
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 09:29:43AM +0200, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> Recently dark mode CSS support was added to the site.
>
> It was reported on IRC the logo's were not visible with them.
Ah, that makes sense. But wouldn't it make sense to remove the logos
from *all* are projects then?
Also since
On 22/04/28 09:29, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> Recently dark mode CSS support was added to the site.
>
> It was reported on IRC the logo's were not visible with them.
This can be remedied with CSS which applies white background to logos (perhaps
with some padding: to also give a bit of a border).
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 05:38:51PM -0500, Robert Winkler wrote:
> On Tue Apr 26, 2022 at 4:21 PM CDT, Κράκ Άουτ wrote:
> > Στις 26 Απρ 2022 23:59, ο/η Robert Winkler έγραψε:
> > > To make a long story short: The input of UTF-8 characters with st needs
> > > an IBus daemon (standard on Gnome, but no
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 08:34:36AM +0600, NRK wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently noticed that the dwm and st logo was removed from their
> homepages[0][1].
>
> I was wondering if there's any specific reason for that, or if there's
> plan for a new logo(s)?
>
> I atleast really liked the current logos, as
21 matches
Mail list logo
