Quoth Carlos Torres:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Nick wrote:
> > Quoth Calvin Morrison:
> >> There was at one time a suckless widget system in the works, I don't
> >> know what happened to that.
> >
> > swt was the name;
>
> https://github.com/vlaadbrain/swt.git
> I started swt. but its be
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 11:23:35PM -0400, Lee Fallat wrote:
> Do you have the right #include statements? Show us your patch as if
> you were about to submit it so someone can help you :)
I've attached the diff to this email. I only saw time.h mentioned in the
man page, so that's the only include I
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Eric Pruitt wrote:
> I'm attempting to write a patch for dwm that uses clock_gettime(3), but
> I cannot figure out how to get librt properly linked to the build.
>
> In config.mk, I changed the LIBS variable:
>
> -LIBS = -L${X11LIB} -lX11 ${XINERAMALIBS}
>
I'm attempting to write a patch for dwm that uses clock_gettime(3), but
I cannot figure out how to get librt properly linked to the build.
In config.mk, I changed the LIBS variable:
-LIBS = -L${X11LIB} -lX11 ${XINERAMALIBS}
+LIBS = -L${X11LIB} -lX11 ${XINERAMALIBS} -lrt
Inside dwm, I als
On Mon 07 Jul 2014 at 15:51:17 PDT Carlos Torres wrote:
Yo,
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Lee Fallat wrote:
AFAIK no graphical official suckless programs
use libsl yet...)
the way you use libsl is a bit un-orthodox. you basically check it
out into your project and just use it that way.
d
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Maxime Coste wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 09:39:36PM +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>> On 7 July 2014 21:24, Maxime Coste wrote:
>> Otherwise the tomatos that you harvest
>> in the summer in your garden might also become property of your
>> employer ;)
>
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 09:39:36PM +0200, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 7 July 2014 21:24, Maxime Coste wrote:
> > Seems to me you probably have tons of corporate copyright without knowing
> > it,
> > most software engineer contract specify that any code written by the
> > employee
> > *including*
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Carlos Torres wrote:
> Yo,
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Lee Fallat wrote:
>> AFAIK no graphical official suckless programs
>> use libsl yet...)
>>
> the way you use libsl is a bit un-orthodox. you basically check it
> out into your project and just use it t
Yo,
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Lee Fallat wrote:
> AFAIK no graphical official suckless programs
> use libsl yet...)
>
the way you use libsl is a bit un-orthodox. you basically check it
out into your project and just use it that way.
dwm uses libsl (somewhat), in that way... see it has drw
Hey,
Any particularly good reason why certain names are missing vowels and
consonants arbitrarily? For example, Fnt vs Font, Drw vs Draw and Cur
vs Cursor. Last I checked typing 1 more letter wasn't a big deal. The
end result is saving 3 to 1 keystrokes all over the place. If we want
to get mathem
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Nick wrote:
> Quoth Calvin Morrison:
>> There was at one time a suckless widget system in the works, I don't
>> know what happened to that.
>
> swt was the name;
https://github.com/vlaadbrain/swt.git
I started swt. but its been idle for a while. not sure i see a p
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Alex-P. Natsios wrote:
> All usable GUI toolkits suck.
>
> However if you want broad portability and a sane toolkit your best bet
> would be the Enlightenment Foundation Libraries (EFL).
>
> The EFL are written in C and focus in both performance and portability
> al
Ah, the library I was thinking of was libsl. I just looked at the
source and it's almost *perfect*. It provides the right amount of
abstraction I want and basic drawing functions. All that I need is a
text widget implemented. A menu lookk pretty simple to cook up and a
text widget shouldn't be too
Quoth Calvin Morrison:
> There was at one time a suckless widget system in the works, I don't
> know what happened to that.
swt was the name; pancake was working on it, but got dissuaded by
the lack of interest / contributions. http://git.suckless.org/swk
If someone wanted to pick it up, that'd
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 16:50:19 -0400
Nick wrote:
> I disagree. Google are much better than Microsoft in terms of
> software freedom, and the culture seems to be pretty good at
> allowing and encouraging free software contributions. I have
> benefited significantly personally and professionally fr
On 7 July 2014 22:34, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> On 7 July 2014 16:25, Lee Fallat wrote:
>> Does anyone know of a graphics library that supports a text and menu
> There was at one time a suckless widget system in the works, I don't
> know what happened to that. What about leveraging other software
All usable GUI toolkits suck.
However if you want broad portability and a sane toolkit your best bet
would be the Enlightenment Foundation Libraries (EFL).
The EFL are written in C and focus in both performance and portability
all the major platforms are supported (and then some).
Wayland is als
Quoth FRIGN:
> In my opinion, Google is at the same level as Microsoft when it comes
> to software-freedom.
I disagree. Google are much better than Microsoft in terms of
software freedom, and the culture seems to be pretty good at
allowing and encouraging free software contributions. I have
be
Considering the amount of work happening in 2f30 i decided it will be
easier for me to send patches there from now on.
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Bigby James wrote:
>> I don't see Ari whining over this, so why would you care? If you care about
>> the project and the direction it is taking,
Quoth Lee Fallat:
> P.S. C with Tcl/Tk seems to be a nightmare.
I was going to suggest Tcl/Tk.
I agree that (at least as far as my experience goes) using C to call
Tk APIs is a terrible way to use Tk. I do like Tcl/Tk a lot, though,
and have used it to wrap around C code quite nicely, reading s
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Calvin Morrison wrote:
> On 7 July 2014 16:25, Lee Fallat wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> Does anyone know of a graphics library that supports a text and menu
>> widget, simple layout system and is easily portable to any OS? I was
>> thinking of maybe just creating something
On 7 July 2014 16:25, Lee Fallat wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Does anyone know of a graphics library that supports a text and menu
> widget, simple layout system and is easily portable to any OS? I was
> thinking of maybe just creating something like this myself because
> it's so specific, but I'd like to se
Quoth FRIGN:
> On Sun, 06 Jul 2014 20:19:15 +0200
> Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> > +© 2014 Google Inc. // author: Michal Nazarewicz
>
> I don't know about you guys but I don't want Google to infest the
> license. Michal, either you join the license with your name only or
> forget about the patch.
Hey,
Does anyone know of a graphics library that supports a text and menu
widget, simple layout system and is easily portable to any OS? I was
thinking of maybe just creating something like this myself because
it's so specific, but I'd like to see if there's anything like that
around. The closest
On 7 July 2014 21:46, FRIGN wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 21:39:36 +0200
> Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>
>> IMHO I only came across such legal terms in a contract proposal by
>> some US company, a couple of years ago.
>> Apart from US companies I can't confirm that such contracts are common
>> practice,
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 21:39:36 +0200
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> IMHO I only came across such legal terms in a contract proposal by
> some US company, a couple of years ago.
> Apart from US companies I can't confirm that such contracts are common
> practice, particularly not under German law.
>
> Sourc
On 7 July 2014 21:24, Maxime Coste wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:53:09PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
>> On Mon, 07 Jul 2014 15:37:05 +0200
>> Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>>
>> > I'm sorry, but no I'm not. The copyright is owned by Google. If you
>> > cannot accept corporate copyright there's no poin
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:53:09PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Jul 2014 15:37:05 +0200
> Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>
> > I'm sorry, but no I'm not. The copyright is owned by Google. If you
> > cannot accept corporate copyright there's no point in me trying to get
> > the patch to be technic
On 7 July 2014 15:53, FRIGN wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Jul 2014 15:37:05 +0200
> Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
>
>> I'm sorry, but no I'm not. The copyright is owned by Google. If you
>> cannot accept corporate copyright there's no point in me trying to get
>> the patch to be technically acceptable.
>
> We
On Mon, 07 Jul 2014 15:37:05 +0200
Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> I'm sorry, but no I'm not. The copyright is owned by Google. If you
> cannot accept corporate copyright there's no point in me trying to get
> the patch to be technically acceptable.
Well, we don't accept corporate copyright. End of
On Mon, Jul 07 2014, Martti Kühne wrote:
> I hope for your sake that you're able to differenciate between the
> different criticisms.
> We may very well appear insane, if you don't care that if you're with
> suckless
>
> * you're in it rather as an individual
I'm sorry, but no I'm not. The copyr
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Martin Kopta wrote:
>
> Alright, I am going for another article in the row. Still no topic set.
> Considering st.
>
> If st, what not to forget to mention?
>
> Otherwise, what should I write about?
>
> BTW, I thought about translating them into English and posting o
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> Wow, you guys are insane.
>
> Sorry for trying to improve dmenu, I won't make that mistake again.
>
I hope for your sake that you're able to differenciate between the
different criticisms.
We may very well appear insane, if you don't car
Wow, you guys are insane.
Sorry for trying to improve dmenu, I won't make that mistake again.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz(o o)
ooo +--o
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:23:47AM +0200, Martin Kopta wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 07:57:37AM +0100, Martin Kopta wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > just wanted to point out my article about Stali [0] which came out today as
> > a
> > third part of the Suckless series on root.cz. First article was
On 07.07.2014 09:14, Markus Teich wrote:
prototype wrote:
I just noticed that dmenu fails to draw the workspace indicators right
when I have a java program opened.
[1] http://picpaste.com/pics/DQH8Gi0q.1404715301.png (focus on workspace 1)
Heyho,
that is actually the status bar you're talki
prototype wrote:
> I just noticed that dmenu fails to draw the workspace indicators right
> when I have a java program opened.
>
> [1] http://picpaste.com/pics/DQH8Gi0q.1404715301.png (focus on workspace 1)
Heyho,
that is actually the status bar you're talking about. ;)
dmenu is a separate pro
Hi folks,
I just noticed that dmenu fails to draw the workspace indicators right
when I have a java program opened.
The problem is that (ONLY!) the first workspace indicator looks weird
when I focus it [1]. When i close my java application the bug disappears
and everything is fine.
I tried t
On July 7, 2014 8:42:19 AM CEST, "Martti Kühne" wrote:
>I feel honored and desecrated for suckless.
>But somebody obviously spent google's paid time on this and had,
>therefore, to note so in the license... xD
Or he wanted to show off his employer.
39 matches
Mail list logo
