selsort computes the wrong normalized coordinates when rectangular selection is
enabled, causing rectangular selection to only work when going toward either the
top left corner, or the bottom right one.
---
st.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/st.c b/st.c
index
Currently, selection is expanded to the end of the line over line breaks only in
regular selection mode, when the line in not empty and when going down and/or
right. This covers all the cases including word selection mode, with the
exception of rectangular selection because it would make this mode
[PATCH] remove unnecessary calls to realloc from tee
>From 0ec20b994eab3fdd7949fbd8c6503990eb1ff94f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakob Kramer
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 00:15:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] remove unnecessary calls to realloc from tee
---
tee.c | 19 +--
1 file changed
> fix, I recommend using xterm's vttest[3] to test the features.
I have used vttest while I was coding in st, and it passes almost of
the test for vt100 (vttest does test for features of xterm, vt2xx, vt3xx
and even vt5xx). I could pass some test, please if your version of vttest
report some error
This patch (and anothers from nonamed) is waiting a reply from nonamed.
If in the next days there is not a reply I will apply the modifications
that I considerer better.
Regards,
--
Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 17:23:03 +0100
Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> I don't care personally. We should definitely add /etc/passwd support
> to su though because currently it only works with /etc/shadow.
Well, I prefer /etc/passwd, given it gives a false feeling of security
using the shadow-file.
In
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 17:13:49 +0100
Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
> Yeah the uid, gid stuff are leftovers because I initially had shadow
> support but could not be arsed to test it so I removed it.
I don't see the reason behind shadow-support. Well, the purpose is to
prevent bruteforcing the password
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 06:20:52PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 17:13:49 +0100
> Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
>
> > Yeah the uid, gid stuff are leftovers because I initially had shadow
> > support but could not be arsed to test it so I removed it.
>
> I don't see the reason behind shad
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 06:08:12PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was very glad to see the initial implementation of login by sin, but
> found some stuff that simplifies the code even more.
> Check the patch for more details, it should speak for itself.
Applied thanks. We should probably fac
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 06:08:12PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was very glad to see the initial implementation of login by sin, but
> found some stuff that simplifies the code even more.
> Check the patch for more details, it should speak for itself.
Thanks.
Yeah the uid, gid stuff are le
Hello,
I was very glad to see the initial implementation of login by sin, but
found some stuff that simplifies the code even more.
Check the patch for more details, it should speak for itself.
Cheers
FRIGN
--
FRIGN
>From b39d86ebdaadfe4880fd1681bd021ea06ecadb75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 02:29:39PM +0200, Jakob Kramer wrote:
> add -t flag to sort
Applied, thanks.
add -t flag to sort
>From 7722341e211f8072ea816087dd5994723a354e1c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakob Kramer
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 20:08:17 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] add -t flag to sort
---
sort.1 | 28 +--
sort.c | 80 ++---
13 matches
Mail list logo
