On 2013-04-10 13:13, William Giokas wrote:
> There are extremely strong technical arguments for using systemd as a
> simple, easy to use and easy to configure initialization system.
systemd trades simplicity for boot-speed and stack integration.
There are always trade-offs. It's just this seems l
Calvin Morrison dixit:
>What is the problem though? for me initialization should be
>ridiculously simple. init should call a simple script, that script
>contains the daemons you want to run, or anything else you want to do
>during boot, including starting networking, login prompts and stuff.
That
On 10 April 2013 16:45, Alex Pilon wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 01:13:51PM -0500, William Giokas wrote:
>> […] you can actually disable almost every feature in systemd with
>> configure flags.
>
> * You can't disable DBus.
>
> Sure, sure, a lot of the rest of the world out there uses DBus. I
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 01:13:51PM -0500, William Giokas wrote:
> […] you can actually disable almost every feature in systemd with
> configure flags.
* You can't disable DBus.
Sure, sure, a lot of the rest of the world out there uses DBus. I
don't unless I have to. It's not just accommodatin
Greetings.
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:17:58 +0200 William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:44:34PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > You can’t easily build Archlinux your way and it’s not modular. You
> > are using the rhetoric of the systemd authors, which slowly
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:44:34PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:44:34 +0200 William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:59:18PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > > The »basic core« shouldn’t be using systemd or udev. You ca
Greetings.
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:44:34 +0200 William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:59:18PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > The »basic core« shouldn’t be using systemd or udev. You can boot Linux
> > into udevtmpfs and no init scripts without systemd and jus
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:59:18PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:59:18 +0200 William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:12:00PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > > Greetings comrades,
> > >
> > > I have been rediscovering p
I 2006 or so i did a linux distro based on pkgsrc based on debian.
(named bluewall)
I contributed a lot of packages to the repo, but probably for the lack
of interest and the lack of contributors i stopped contributing to it.
after moving to archlinux for a while, now i'm a happy void user.
Greetings.
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:59:18 +0200 William Giokas <1007...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:12:00PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > Greetings comrades,
> >
> > I have been rediscovering pkgsrc due to the inability of the Arch devel‐
> > opers to keep to their principl
Christoph Lohmann dixit:
>How are you using pkgsrc and how do you install a new system with just
>pkgsrc?
NetBSD® pkgsrc® is a method to install a set of packages
on top of a base system, like all the BSDs have.
I guess you’ll need a minimal GNU/Linux system below it,
maybe https://github.com/
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:12:00PM +0200, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Greetings comrades,
>
> I have been rediscovering pkgsrc due to the inability of the Arch devel‐
> opers to keep to their principles. I know pkgsrc has its merits because
> of its portability, but it’s flexible.
Might I ask wha
Greetings comrades,
I have been rediscovering pkgsrc due to the inability of the Arch devel‐
opers to keep to their principles. I know pkgsrc has its merits because
of its portability, but it’s flexible.
So a call to all Linux users of pkgsrc:
How are you using pkgsrc and how do you install a
13 matches
Mail list logo
