On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> none of which indicates mk is any more similar to make than redo
To actually answer your question, mk-files resemble Makefiles more
than whatever redo is using.
--Andrew Hills
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 08:14:12PM -0400, Andreas Wagner wrote:
> The design, not the code. "Make" refers to the default make on a system
> which could be GNU Make, BSD Make or whatever. Typically "make" does not
> refer to a codebase except maybe the make from UNIX which few have actually
> used.
possibly SSL session doesnt time out after 3 or 5 minutes?
--Carlos
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Troels Henriksen wrote:
> Surf 0.5 is now available from http://surf.suckless.org.
>
> Since the last release, surf has gained a number of exciting features,
> for example:
>
> * No longer cras
The design, not the code. "Make" refers to the default make on a system
which could be GNU Make, BSD Make or whatever. Typically "make" does not
refer to a codebase except maybe the make from UNIX which few have actually
used.
On Jul 15, 2012 7:58 PM, "Kurt H Maier" wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 07:42:06PM -0400, Prakhar Goel wrote:
>
> So?
So mk is a cleaned up make and redo isn't? Not buying it.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Jacob Todd wrote:
> Mk shares no code from make.
>
[snip]
So?
--
Warm Regards
Prakhar Goel
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/newt0311
Mk shares no code from make.
On Jul 15, 2012 1:54 PM, "Andreas Wagner" wrote:
> Mk is just a cleaned up version of make. In contrast, the implementations
> of redo itself and build files written for it are much simpler. Redo also
> improves on correctness.
>
> Check this out: http://cr.yp.to/redo
See my earlier reply concerning the minimal branch.
--
Warm Regards
Prakhar Goel
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/newt0311
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 06:53:38PM -0400, Prakhar Goel wrote:
>
> Redo will do the same things that make did but better.
I think make does the "not be written in fucking python" thing better.
Do you have a patch that addresses this?
Thanks,
Kurt
Guillaume,
Redo will do the same things that make did but better. It'll let you
automate the processing of your latex files but you can write the
processing code in sh (or any other language of your choosing). If the
underlying files change (and your build scripts correctly declare the
dependencie
To all the people complaining about python: there is a minimal version
which is ~250 lines of sh. You loose a few things like incremental
builds but the core build system is still available.
--
Warm Regards
Prakhar Goel
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/newt0311
On 15 July 2012 18:54, Andreas Wagner wrote:
> Mk is just a cleaned up version of make. In contrast, the implementations of
> redo itself and build files written for it are much simpler. Redo also
> improves on correctness.
>
> Check this out: http://cr.yp.to/redo.html
>
> I like redo, but I do th
> I propose adding redo to the list of software that rocks.
I love redo as a tool (mostly because I love sh), though I can't say I've read
through the code and suckless is more about good, short, hackzble code than
usefulness as a tool :)
Mk is just a cleaned up version of make. In contrast, the implementations
of redo itself and build files written for it are much simpler. Redo also
improves on correctness.
Check this out: http://cr.yp.to/redo.html
I like redo, but I do think it should have been implemented in C from the
start.
On 15 July 2012 15:28, Prakhar Goel wrote:
> I propose adding redo to the list of software that rocks. It'll also
> give you a nice incremental build system to use.
>
> Info here: http://apenwarr.ca/log/?m=201012#14
The holy make replacement is already there:
http://man.suckless.org/9base/mk
Hi,
I am far far from being an expert of make and so can
you explain to me why/how
- is the parallelism better?
- can it build LaTeX document better (than make)?
(``no baked-in assumptions about what you're building;")
- are checksums better?
Guillaume.
2012/7/15, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.
Surf 0.5 is now available from http://surf.suckless.org.
Since the last release, surf has gained a number of exciting features,
for example:
* No longer crashes when closing a window during loading.
* Properly capitalised window class.
* Something about SSL.
For the next release, the surf h
Greetings.
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 15:49:08 +0200 Prakhar Goel wrote:
> I propose adding redo to the list of software that rocks. It'll also
> give you a nice incremental build system to use.
>
> Info here: http://apenwarr.ca/log/?m=201012#14
It's Python. No.
> Actually, pretty much all of DJBs so
I propose adding redo to the list of software that rocks. It'll also
give you a nice incremental build system to use.
Info here: http://apenwarr.ca/log/?m=201012#14
Github page: https://github.com/apenwarr/redo
Actually, pretty much all of DJBs software (daemontools, qmail,
djbdns, etc...) could
19 matches
Mail list logo
