On 15 July 2012 18:54, Andreas Wagner <andreasbwag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Mk is just a cleaned up version of make. In contrast, the implementations of > redo itself and build files written for it are much simpler. Redo also > improves on correctness. > > Check this out: http://cr.yp.to/redo.html > > I like redo, but I do think it should have been implemented in C from the > start.
I agree. Redo is much nicer than make or mk conceptually, but I don't think Python tools are very nice -- ^C and you've suddenly got stack trace all over you. I'd be very interested in a C implementation, actually. cls
